|
A List of Some MLMs, Past and Present
Some
have been investigated by the FTC; some are no longer in business.
Believe me, there are many, many more. There's one starting up and
one going out of business every minute, so it isn't worth keeping
the above list up-to-date. This list doesn't even include the many,
many companies utilizing MLM structures and practices who do not
fit neatly under the current MLM legal classification.
Before you get too excited about any "business opportunity",
remember how many before you thought the same of their own biz opp!
You
may search this page by using CTRL+F in your browser window.
1-800-PartyShop
1 800 Wine Shop
121.tv
1CellNet
1network.com
1st Family
1Voice Worldwide
2by2.net
2000now.co.uk
21st Century Nutriceuticals
21stNetwork.com
2-Day Slimdown Momentum Worldwide
2Xtreme Performance International
4E-Corp
4 the Good Life
4Life Research, LC
5LINX Enterprises Inc
7startrading Pvt. Ltd.
8Point Communications
A1 Internet Service Provider
aatcm
A Better Chance PTY
Abundant Health Ltd.
Abunza
Acai Plus
Acara
Accelerated Internet Income Strategies
Accentz
Acceris Communications
Accountanet Ltd
Achievers Unlimited
Communications
Achieve Success Team (AST)
Achievers Unlimited, Inc.
Acme Trade Link
AcoMark Concepts Pvt. Ltd.
Active 8
Act II Jewelry, Inc.
ACTIS Global Ventures
Active Business Solutions
Active Life
Adapt-a-Life Inc
AdCalls Inc
Addcell
Adora LLC
Ad Powerone
Adsavers
AdSurfDaily
Adora LLC
Advanced Health Care Systems / Dean Distributors, Inc. / Cambridge
Direct Sales / Medibase
Advantage Conferences
Advantage International
Advantage
Marketing Systems, Inc
AdvantageMax
Advantage Nutraceuticals
AdverWorld
Advita Energy
AdvoCare International
Aerus LLC / Electrolux USA
Affinity Just-2
Affinity Lifestyles
Affordable Energy
Affordable Luxuries
AFM Technologies
Agel Enterprises LLC
Agent Nation
AGLOCO
AGS Wholesale Distributor
Agua Dulce
Aihu Inc
Albert Konder Collection
alcome perfumes & cosmetics
AllXClub
AIM International
Aim Renaissance Ltd.
Airlume, Inc.
Airnex Communications Inc
Airseed
Akuna Health Products
Albert Konder Collection
Allegrovision Marketimg pvt.ltd.
Alive International
AliveMax
Alive Worldwide
AlkalineLife.com
All That's Natural
AllAdvantage.com
All Dazzle
Alliance Nutritionals
Alliance Technology Intl (ATI)
All Jeweled Up
AllXClub
Aloette Cosmetics
Alpha 2000 Ltd
AlphaCom, Inc.
AlphaTonics
Alpine Industries, Inc.
AlpineV
Amazon Herb Company
AMC Corporation
Ambit Energy
AmCall Long Distance Services
amega global
American Bill Money
American Bio Labs Inc.
American Communications Network (ACN)
American Dream Nutrition
American Freeway 100
American Health and Financial
American Image Marketing
American Income Life Insurance
American Longevity
American Petroleum Promotions
American Shoppers Network (ASN)
America's Future
America's MLM Consultants
America's Team
American Telecom Network (ATN)
Americore Mortgage
Americraft Cookware
AmeriKare
AmeriLat
AmeriPlan Dental Care
AmeriPlan USA
Ameriquest Travel
AmeriReach
AmeriSciences
AmeriTalks.com, Inc.
AmethystShells
Amigo Health Inc.
Amkey Inc.
AMS Health Sciences (Advantage Marketing Systems)
Amsoil
Amsonline
Amway / Quixtar / Alticor / Team of Destiny
Ancestry.com
Ancient Legacy
Anew International
Angel Company
Angela Moore Inc
Anise Cosmetics
Annása
Apeus
Aqua America
aquachi.us
Aqua Genus
AquaSource
ARAS Tiernahrung
Arbonne International, Inc.
Ardyss International
Armchair Tycoon
Aromatic Delights
Array International
Art & Soul Inc.
Art and Soul in the Home
Art Finds International
Artistic Impressions, Inc.
Art of Better Living
A Sandy Clough Tea
Asantae (Inflammation Solutions)
Ascend Technologies International
Ascential Bioscience
Ashley's Garden
Aspire Worldwide
Aspiritus
Assantae (Inflammation Solutions)
Assured Nutrition Plus, Inc.
ATG Technologies
AtHome America, Inc.
ATN
A Touch of Tahiti
ATX Inc.
AuctionDiner
Aularale Cosmetics Inc
AuraStella
Auto Dream Team Building System
Avalar Network, Inc.
Avalar Real Estate Alliance / Avalar Real Estate & Mortgage
Network
Avalla
AVAR Direct
Avedis Group
Avon Products, Inc.
Awareness Corporation
AwarenessLife Corporation
AxsWorld
AyurVida
Azante Jewelry
Aztech Financial
B&F System Inc.
BabyCrazy
Baby Splendor
Bacchus Weinhaus
Balance Company
Balanced Living Company
BAMBRIA.com
Bangalore True Value Marketing PVT LTD
Barefoot Books
Barclays System
Basic Energy & Affiliated Resources, Inc.
Bausparkasse Mainz
Baywood International
Bazi
Bead Retreat Ltd.
Beads of Hope LLC
Beat The System
BeautiControl
Beauty Counselors of /du Canada Inc.
Become International Inc
Bel'Air
Benchmark USA
Benefactory
Berry Tree
Bessemer Sales
Bestline
Best Travel Spot Online
Better Universe
Bhartiya Online Service System Pvt. Ltd. (B.O.S.S.)
bHIP Global
Big Bang Infonetwork Pvt. Ltd.
BigBanyanTree.com
Big Book Direct
BigBooster7Million
Big Co-op.com
BigDot1
Big Ear Inc.
Big Enough
BigSmart
Big Yellow Box
Billion Dollar Travel Network
Bimini Essentials
Bing Han Enterprises Ltd
Binney & Smith At Home, LLC
BioBlueprint
BioComfort Produkte zur Gesundheitspfledge GmbH
BioCrave Health Products
Bio EnerChi Company
BioGenica
Biogenx Global
Biogime
BioGreen Systems Inc
Bio Lumen Essence
Biometics International, Inc.
BioNovix
BioPerformance
BIOPRO Technology
BIO-WATER
Bio-Wealth
Birthday Shack
Bittersweet Candle Co.
BizAdigm
BizAdSplash
Biz Calling Cards
BizzBuzz
BizNas.com
Black Magic 95
Blessed Hope Communications
Blessings Unlimited
Blue Strawberry Bath
Boagie Report
Bobri
Bodega Chocolates
Bodies Best International
Body Alive International Inc. / Oxygen Labs
Body Electric
Body Extreme
Body Shop at Home
Body Shop Direct
Body Soul Elements
Body Wise International, Inc.
Bodyguard Technologies
Bookbiz
Books and Beyond, Inc.
Bookwise Books
Boresha Coffee
Boston Finney
Boudoir Bliss
BOV Intimates
BPI Worldwide
Brain Garden
Breakfast Club
BR Global Inc
BRIDAL ACCENTS, LTD.
Bright Minds - Critical Thinking
Brite Music Inc
Briteage Health Corporation
Broad Point Communications
Brown Bag Gourmet Goodies
Brown Bag Party
B's Purses & Accessories
BuildReferrals.com
Bulletin Board
BurnLounge
Business Cybernetics Ltd.
Butterfly Worldwide LLC
Cabionline
Cabouchon International
Cajun Country Candies
Call The Planet (CTP)
Calls for Kids
Cambridge Diet / Cambridge Health Plan Ltd
Canadian Diamond Traders
Candle Creations by Sandie
CandleWealth International
Can-Talk
Cantos Marketing Pvt. Ltd.
Cantralliance
Canyon World Quest
Capella Group Inc
CardConcepts
Care One, Inc
Care Entree
Carico International, Inc.
Carlisle
Carlson Craft
Carolina Fine Cookies
Caruba International
Cashcard Worldwide
Cash Cards International
Cash Club
CASHCulture.com
Cash Evolution
Cash Leveraging System
Casino Cash
CCO Telecom
CDDiscounter.com
CDI Telecom
Celebrating Home
Celebration Fashions Inc
Celebrations by Lillian Vernon
Celestial Harvest
Cell Tech
Cellphone Toolbox
Cello In A Box
CellWireless Corporation
CenterSource Life Systems
Cera Bella
Chamelle
Champion Communications
Charmed Moments
Charmelle
Changes International Inc.
Chantal B - Paris
Character Building Company
Charitable Partners
Charity Bond
CharityFirst
Charmed Moments
Charmelle
Che-Ching
Chef Selections
Chef Specialties Company
Cherish Designs
Chesapeake Bay Company
Chews 4 Health
Chez Ami
ChicBoutique at Home
Chicken Soup for the Soul Supplements
Chic Pursenality Inc.
Child-Shield-USA.com
Chi Machine
Chu's Pearls LLC
Circles of Life USA
Citizenre Corporation
Claire Murray Home Gallery
Clark Enterprises
Claudia Jean Collection
ClayTime Inc.
Clearock, Inc
Cleary Hudson Constructoin (CHConstruction)
Clear Your Credit, Inc.
Cleure
Clever Container
ClickBank
ClickIncomes.com
Close to My Heart
Club Atlanta Travel
ClubBucks Rewards Progrm
Clubco
Club Depot
Club Joe Coffee
Club Midas
ClubShop Online
Clustered Water
Coastal Vacations
Cobra Group
Coffee Club International
CoffeeFair
CoffeeFirst LLC
Cognigen Networks Inc
Colesce Couture (Cameo)
Colonial Structures Inc
Color Connections
Color Me Beautiful
Comforts of Home Inc
Comfort Zone / PRISM ENTERPRISES
Competitive Games Inc
Concorde Group
Conklin Company, Inc.
Connect 24/7
Consumer 1st
CONSUMER DIRECT
Consumers Direct Buyers Network (CDBN)
Conybio India
Cookie Lee Inc
Cookie Life
Cooksey Keepsakes
Coral Connection
CORE Club
CoreVital International
Corlink Communications
Cossets Marketing Pvt. Ltd.
Cosway Phils, Inc.
Country Bunny Bath & Body
Country Charm Candle & Soap Co.
Country Club
Country Peddlers & Company of America, Inc.
CouponsMan
CPL Media
Crafts ala Cart
Crafty Kids Pty Ltd.
Create-A-Book Inc
Creations
Creative Memories
Creative Network International
Creative Photo Concepts
Credit Development International
CRK Interactive Inc
Cristian Lay
Cruise to Cash Vacations
Culture Farms
Custom Corner
CUTCO / Vector Marketing Corp / Alcas Corporation
Cutting Edge International
Cutting Edge Vitamins
Cybergold Inc
CyberWize.com
Daisy Blue Naturals LLC
Dale Networks Pvt. Ltd.
Dane Nig Ltd
Dare2BU Records Inc
Darius Marketing, Inc.
Darswinkle's Delights
DASH Minerals
Dashyn Delights
Data Life Associates
Data Process Marketing (DP Marketing)
Dautol
DAXEN INC.
DaySpring
Daystar
DEAXIS LLC
Debt Free America
Debt Free Publishing Inc /
DebttoFreedom.com
Debt Zapper
Deesse International Gmbh
Delfin International
Demarle At Home, Inc.
Denali Health Sciences
Designed By You
Desire Parties
Destinations By Mava D.
Destinations Fashions
Destiny-2000 ltd.
Destiny Telecomm International
DeTech, Inc.
Devas Online Business Marketing
Dewsoft Overseas
DHS Club
Dialer Freedom
Diamond Cash Club
Diamond Club of America
DiamondCreek Candles
Diamond Depot
DietBlends
Digital Crown Holdings Ltd. (DCHL)
Digital Dynamix (Trillion Dollar Trend)
Diolink
Diotek India Limited
Direct 2U Fashions Pty Ltd
Direct Educational Technologies India, Ltd.
Direct Matches.com
Direct Nutrition Inc
Discount Home Shopping Club (DHS)
Discovery Toys
Discovery Toys Inc.
DK Family Learning Educational Products
DNAINDIA
DoItAll Travel
Dominator Clothing
Doncaster
Doodles Direct
Do Re Me & You!
Dorling Kindersley
DoTerra Earth Essence
Dove Chocolate Discoveries
Downline Building Group
Dragon Slayer
Dr. Glass Window Washing
Dream Impressions
Dream India Concepts
DrinkACT
Dr. Nona International, Ltd
DropshipDesign.com
Dr. Organics, Inc
DS-MAX U.S.A. Inc. / Innovage
DSX
Dubai MLM
DubLi Network / DubLi.com GmbH
Dudley Beauty Corp LLC
Dudley Products
Dutch International
DWG International
Dynamic Essentials
Dynamic Freedom, Inc.
Dynamic Wealth
Dynamite Marketing
Dynasty of Diamonds
E3Flix Inc
Earth Angels
Earth Essence
Earth Pride International
Earth Safe & Wellness
Technologies Inc.
Earth's Elements
Earth Tribe Aromatics
Easy Daily Cash
Easy Marketing Inc.
Easy Multitrade International
Easy Pha-Max
Easy Postcard Marketing
Easy Way International
Ebiz.com Pvt Ltd
ebiznas
eBiz Rotator
eBook Wholesaler
Ecash Trust
ecb4U
Eclipse Jewelry in Motion
ECN
EcoEnergizer
EcoQuest International
eCosway.com
Eden River
eDirect America
Edmark International
EDT International
Education Explorations
E. Excel International
efusion
E-GroceryCoupons.com
eHostingBiz.net
Eiro
EIS Emergency Information Services
Eismann International Ltd
eKaire
Elearnexpress.com
Electric Life
Electrum International
Elektro & Metallwaren Vertriebs GmbH
Elements Home Spa
Elite Choice Nutritionals
Elite Profit Network
ELIXIR-HEALTH
Elnapress Inc.
Elysee Scientific Cosmetics
Emancipation Network
emarket pros
Emerald Coast News
Emerald Passport (Profit Masters)
Emilys Attic
Éminence Organics
Empexis Corporation
Empire Business Brokers
Empower Life International
Empower Net
Enagic USA
Enchanted Potions
Enchanted Scents & Potions by Design
Enchanting Scents Designs
Energetix Magnet Therapy
EnergyCel Marketing Group
Energy Release
Enerstem (Entrenet Nutritionals)
eNewLife
English Collectables
Enhanced Living International
Eniva Corporation
Enjo Ltd
Enliven International Inc.
Enlyten
Enrich International
Entech Corporation
Entertain With Ease!
Entertaining at Home
Entrenet
Entrust America
Envigra
Envion
Environmental Construction Tech
Environmental Nutrition Network
Enviro-Tech International
EnvisionCC
Enzacta
E'OLA Products International
EonDeck.Com, Inc.
eorbiter
Epic Network International
Epicure Selections
EplanetParadise
ePyramids
Equinox International / Trek Alliance / Advanced
Marketing Systems / BG Management
Equitynet
Equity Now America
Esa-Star Touch International
Escape International LLC
Espial USA
Esquire Marketing
Essante Corporation
ESSE Designer Sterlling
Essen USA
Essential Bodywear
Essentially Yours Industries Inc.
Essentials Blue Line Cosmetics Ltd.
eStarNetwork
Esther
Esteem Jewelry
Esteem Now Inc
Esthetics International Group Bhd
Eterna Health
Eternal HGH
Etherea Aromatics
Ethnic Expressions
Ethos Environmental Inc
Euphony Communications
Eurobotanicals Inc.
Eventus International
EverydayWealth
Evolution International
eWorldMedia.com
eWorldnet
Excel Telecommunications / Vartec Telecom
Executive Connections Network
eXfuze
Explose EU
EXOVAP Ltd.
Express Online
Extreme Powerline
Extreme Proteam
Extreme Research Corp
ezeADZ
EZEEBIZ.COM PVT. LTD.
E-ZineLibrary.com
EZ Wealth by Design
Ezze net
F.A.I.T.H. Company
Family and Friends Financial
Family Books at Home
Family Health Network
Family Integrity Buyline, Inc (FIBI)
Family Manager
Family of Eagles
Family Solution
Fantastic Life Systems
Fantasy Inc
Fantasy Lady
Fashion Suitings Pvt. Ltd. (RCM)
Fax Box Network
Federal Chamber of Commerce
Federal Financial
FemOne
FIACom Inc
Fifth Avenue Collection
Filway
Financial Circuit
Financial Destination Inc
Financial Freedom Society
Financial Health Research Institute (FHRI)
Finanzas Forex (Evolution Market Group, Inc. )
Fine-me-a-trip.com
Fine Choice Food Club
Finest Accessories Inc
Firelead Affiliate Network
Firestone Farms Down Home
First Financial Security
First Fitness International
First Marketing Group
First Place Realty
First Quadrant International
First Step
Five Dollar Gimmick / Buzzard Holdings Ltd
FixMyCrib.com
Five Star Auto Club
Flavon Group kft
Flashnet
Flight of Fancy
Flint River Ranch
FNUSA
Focus International Credit Card Plan
FoodTech International
Footprints International
For Earth Incorporated
Forever Green
Forever Int'l
Forever Living Products International
For Every Home
Forever Young Pty Ltd
For Every Body
For Every Home
ForMor International
For More International
Forte Builder (New Vision)
Fortuna Alliance
Fortuna Inter Nusantara
Fortune21
Fortune High Tech Marketing
Fortune in Motion
Fortune Quest
Forum Technologies
For You, Inc.
For Your Pleasure Inc
Found You Online, Inc
Fountain of Life .
Fourfront Limited
Four Seasons Candle Co.
FOURSTP MARKETING PVT. LTD.
Fragrant Lemon Peel (the) TFLP
France Bed Sales Co Ltd
France Luxe
Freebie Force
Free Card Matrix
FreeCoralCalcium
Freedom America
Freedomgel
Freedom One Services
FreedomQwest
Freedom Rocks
Freedomstar Communications
Free Gifts Galore
Free India Concepts
FreeLife International
FreeNetSolution
Free Network
Freeway 100
Free Yourself
Freitas Bueno Consultoria Juridica
French Rags
Frequency Foods
Friuli Thermolana SRL
Frozen Lease
Frutaiga
Fruta Vida
Fruitaiga
Fuel Freedom International
Fuel Legacy International / eefuel
Fuel Zone
Fuh Jen International Co Ltd
Fukufuku Co Ltd
Full-Circle Success
Fuller Brush Company
Fund America Inc
Fun For Life Club
Fun Quest of America
FUN Unlimited (Power Pops)
Funky Diva Shop
Furnished Garden
FutureMart
FutureNet, Inc.
Future World Corporation
Fuzzy Zoeller Productions, Inc.
Gabby Goodies
Gakken Credit Co Ltd
Gakken Home Study Co Ltd
Gakushin Co Ltd
Galaxy Products & Services Inc
Galaxy Products & Services Inc
Game of Opportunity, LLC
Gano Excel USA Inc
GASAG Direkt
GmbH
Gas Net
GasUpUSA
Gathering of Goddesses
GBG
GCMI Long Distance
G'Core Group Inc
GemCap Equity Management, Inc
Geminet
GEM Lifestyle
Generations of Health AB
Genesis Pure
Genesis Secret
Genesis Today, Inc.
GeneWize Life Sciences
Genossenschaft Arbeitsheim Wangen
Geon Limited
Getaway Club
GetGasFree Marketing Group
Get Moving Today (GMT)
Get the Word Out!
ghpSport
gibLine
Giffarine Skyline Unity Co Ltd
Giftware Plus
Gioielli International Inc
Giving You Credit, Inc.
GLA International, Inc.
GladNet Corporation
Glass Bracelet
Global$nowball
Global Assistance Network for Charities
Global Cause
GLOBAL COLLABORATORS
Global Communications Solutions Inc.
Global Community
Global Domains International (GDI)
Global Elite Marketing
Global Equity Marketing and Global Equity Lending (World Leadership
Group)
Global Gold Marketing
Global Health Trax
Global Interactive Investment Club
Global Learning Ltd
Global Network Development
Global Network Marketing, Inc.
Global Nutrition Network
Global Options NZ Ltd
Global Prelaunch
Global Procurement Corp
Global Prosperity Group / Global Prosperity Marketing Group
Global Resorts Network
Global Travel International
Global Village Market
Global Vision
Global Wealth Trade Corp
Global Wellness Club
Globalwon
GlobalFX Network
GlobalTelework
Global Travel Trends (PRT Travel)
Globestar
Globion
GNLD International
Gnnuri Inc
Go4Millions
Go Auto Club
Go-Go for Life International LLC
GoHFT
Going Platinum, Inc.
Goji Juice
Gold Canyon Candle
Goldbiz Inc
Golden Chemical Pty Ltd
Golden Neo-Life Diamite International (GNLD)
Golden Nutrition
Golden Pride International
GoldenRAM Direct Inc
Goldiger Marketing
Gold Mine International
GoldQuest
Goldshield Elite / Changes Intl.
Goldshield Group Ltd.
Gold Unlimited
Gonis GmbH & Co.
Good Books & Company, LLC
Good Life International
Good Nature Company
Good to Grow Garden Outfitters, LLC
Got Zip Inc
Gourmet Coffee Club
GoYin
Grand Ware Co Ltd
Great American - The Wholefood Farmacy
Great HealthWorks
Great Life International
Great Life Products.com
GreaatShades
Great Thornton
Green & Health Bio Marketing (P) Ltd,
Green Mountain Energy
Green Planet Bio Products
Green Valley
Greenwood Health Systems
Greenzap
Greeting Cake Company
Greta's Bake at Home Cookies
GRI Telecommunications
GroceryBiz
Grove Marketing
GT Trends
Gulf Coast Nutritional Inc (Noah's Ark)
H2Oil Corporation
Habitude International
HAKA Kunz GmbH
Hakaju Institute for Health Science Ltd
Half Water Half Gas
Halpage Overseas PVT LTD
Hanbul Co Ltd
Hankook Glandoman Publishing Co.
Happy Family Corporation
Happy Gardener
Ha-Ra Nederland
Harmonde
Harmonika Dinamika
Harvest America
Harvest Grove
Harvest Home Candles
Harvesting America
Hatsuda Co Ltd
Hawaii HerbalTech Corporation
HB Products
Healing America
Health 4 Wealth
Health & Nutrition Network
Health Driven
Health Dyamics Research Company
Healthe-Choice
Health First Technlogies GOHFT
Health for Life
Health-Mor
Health Thru Nutrition (HTN)
Health Voyage
Healthient
Healthy Homes Marketing Pte Ltd
Healthy Living Pvt Ldt
Healthy Outlook
Healthy Pet Net / Trilogy International
Healthy Steps
Heart Warming Creations Inc
Heart Warming Goodness
Healthy Coffee LLC
HealthyPetNet
Heim & Haus, Produktion
Heim International Co Ltd
Helicolor France
HelpWithTeenagers LLC
Henn Workshops
Henri Maire
Henry Beautiful
Herbalife / Newest Way to Wealth
Herbitrol
Herbazone
Herbo International Pvt.Ltd
Herios AB
Heritage Health Products
Company
Heritage Makers
Herway Inc
H.I.D. International
Hi Energy Weight Control Inc
High-Desert (M) SDN BHD
Highlights-Jigsaw Toy Factory, Ltd.
High Opportunity
High Velocity Video
Petroleum Enterprise (HOPE)
High-Tech Safety
Higher Ideals
Highlights-Jigsaw Toy Factory, Ltd.
Hillary's Blinds Ltd
Hindustan Lever Network
Hits USA
Hobson Audley
Holbrook Cottage, Inc.
Holiday Magic
Holy Tea Club
Home & Garden Party Ltd
Home-Business-Funding
Home Business Group
Home Business Incubator
Home Business Monthly
Home Choice
Home Direct Lts
Home Interiors & Gifts, Inc.
Homeline Electronics AG
Homelend / Homenet
Homemade Gourmet, Inc.
Homemailers Programme
Homemaker's Idea Club/Company
Home Owners Network Club
Homes For Living
HomeTec
Home Travel Agent
HomeWare Creations
Honeysuckle Cove
Horizons Marketing Group
Hot Conference
Hottpixx.com
House of Commons
House of Health
House of Lloyd (Christmas Around the World)
House of Sara Lee
Household System Co Ltd
HRP Marketing PVT LTD
Hsin Ten Enterprises USA, Inc. (HTE USA)
Hunt'n Biz & Fish'n Biz
Hy Cite Corporation
IamVoip
Iberinox S.A.
iBuzzPro
ICI
ICON Communicator
ICR Services, Inc
IDA Marketing Services
Idea Concepts
I Deal In Travel
Ideal Health International
Ideal Solutions Int'l
I.D. It! Plates
Idn-Nu Skin INternational
Iexalt Family
iFreedom
Ignite Inc
Ignite/Stream of Energy
Igonet
iKobo, Inc.
Ikuei Co Ltd
Ikueisha Co
ILC - Laurent Cristonel
iLearningGlobal.tv (ILG)
I-LINK Worldwide LLC
I Luv My Pet Inc
Images
Imagine2020
Iman
Imandi Rewards
Immunocal
Immunotech Inc
Immunotec Research
Imn Dot Com Pvt. Ltd.
Imogen Concepts Inc
iMoms (Internet Moms)
Impact America
Imperiale World Services SPA
Importupp Ltda
Immunotec
IMX
IncomeWorks
INCOMNET COM (SIMPLE2 NET)
Incorporated Company Flare
Incredible Products
iNetStar International
Infinity800
Infinity Downline
Infinity Int'l Health & Beauty
Infinity Success
Infinity2 Inc
Initial Outfitters
Initials Inc
InkVogue Ltd T-A Vogue Care
In-Home Art
Initial Outfitters
inmediaONE Bertedsmann Direktvertriebe GmbH
Innerfeel
InnerLight International Inc
Innovage
Innovative Technologies Corp of America
INS Enterprise SCN BHD
Inside-n-out
Inspired Aroma Inc
InstantEbookBusiness.com
Integrated Synergy
Integris Global, LP
Intelligent Nutrients
Intelligent Nutrition Systems Inc.
Interactive Ventures Corporation
Interfield Systems Inc
International Direct Mail Network
International Galleries (IGI)
International Global Opportunity Network LLC / IGONET
Inetekk.com
Interiors by Totally Tropical
International Business Network, Inc.
International Heritage
International Metals & Trade
International Philanthropists Society
International Team Works Inc. (ITI)
International Wealth
Internet 4 Families (I4F)
Intimo Lingerie Pty Ltd
In Touch Communications and Networking Inc.
Intway World Corporation
iNutrition
Invisus Direct
Inwayy
IONIQUE
IONYX International
IPC International Publishing Co AB
IPowerBiz
I Remember When
Iron Curtain Labs
Isagenix International
ISI Value Network
ISPVIP.Biz / ISPVIP.net, LLC
isXPERIA
ITI
It's Life
ITV Ventures
It Works! Marketing Inc
Ixora Corporation SDN BHD
Jafra Cosmetics International, Inc.
Janglefish
Janome Sewing Machine Co Ltd
Japan Life America Corp
Japan Life of India
JBP Associates Ltd
Jean Guthrie Beauty Care
Jenny Lane SA
Jerky Direct
Jet Set Life Technologies Inc
Jeunique International, Inc.
Jewelry at Home
Jewels by Park Lane
JewelWay
JGO
Jiff-e-Books
Jigsaw Toy Factory Pty Ltd
J Lynn Designs, Inc
J.M. Fino Lda
JM Global
Jockey Person to Person
Joielle LLC
Joker 88
Jolica
Jordan Essentials
joseph wealth systems
Jowalet Co Ltd
Joy Enterprises
Joystar
JRJ Co Ltd
JS Homestyle, LLC
J-S-R International
Jubilee International
Juice Plus
Juki Co Ltd
Julian Hill Parfum AB
Juliana Collezione
Jurak Corporation Worldwide
Jus International
Just Add Guests
Just Deutschland GmbH
Just Ducky Originals
Just For Fun
Just S.A.
Justine Pty Ltd
Justine Avon
Juvio
Kabel Deutschland Managment GmbH & Co.
Kadima Inc
Kanebo Ltd
Kanosis
Kara Vita LLC
Kaire International / Kaire Nutraceuticals
kallis kreations
Kara Vita, LLC
KareMore International
Kasey's Coupons
Kat's Coffees
Kazil Express USA
Kedia Infotech Limited
Keibunkan Co Ltd
Kele n Co
Keller Williams Realty
Kelly's Kids
Key West Aloe
Kharmisma Gizindo Perkasa (New Image)
khushibiz
Kidz Boulevard
KickBrix
Kiiera
Killer Buzz
Kimberly's Closet
Kinetic Resource International
Kingdom Treasures
Kings Choice
KingsMaker
KingsWay Inc
Kirby Company (Vacuum)
Kiotis
Kirks Folly Design
Kitchen Fair / Regal Ware
Kleeneze
K-LINK International
KM.net
Knutek
Kompass Infosolutions Pvt. Ltd.
Koscot Interplanetary
Krystal Planet
K Sanko Co Ltd
Ky-Ani Sun / Kyani
Kyoiku Tosho Center Co Ltd
Kyowa-Life Co Ltd
Kyowon Group
Ladybug Garden Parties
Latasia & Company
L'Bel Paris
L'Bri Pure N' Natural
Laboratorio Somar Sa De CV
Laboratorios Schule S.C.A.
Ladder Publishing Co Ltd
Lady Emily
Lady Remington Jewelry, Inc.
Ladybug Garden Parties, Inc.
Lafayette Miracle Solutions
Laga Designs
Lajann AB
Lake Industries Company
Lametco Int.
Lanfar International Co
La Principessa By Principe SAS
L Arome International
Le Reve Pty Ltd
Lars OG Lene KL & R AS
Latasia & Company / Latasia Jewelry
Leaders Club
LeadGusher
Leading Concepts
Lead Lightning, Inc
Leads2YourSuccess
L.E.A.P. (Life, Education & Prosperity Inc)
Leaving Prints
Le Club Privé
Learner's World
Learning AIDS (S) PTE Ltd
Learning Dynamics SDN BHD
Learning is an Art
Leaving Prints
LEETTRAFE INC. (Phils.)
Legacy for Life, Inc.
Legacy International Health Solutions
Legacy Network
Legacy USA (DCV)
Le Gourmet Gift Baskets Inc.
Lemongrass Spa Products
Le Naturel
Le Natural Int'l
Let's Do Tea LLC
LetsGetPaid
Leveraged Gold Club
Lexli MD, Inc.
Lexxus International
LFI Group
Lia Sophia
Liberty Financial of North America Inc.
Liberty Health Benefits Inc
Liberty Health Net
Liberty International
Liberty League International (LLI)
Liberty Management Group
Lies und Spiel Hausparty
LIFECARE
Life Dynamics International
Life Education And Prosperity
Life Force International
Life Link Ltc
LifeMax
LifeMist Home Products LLC
Life Plus International
LifePath Unlimited
Life Plus International
Life Prints
Life Quest Corporation
Life Science Technology
Life Sciences Products, Inc.
Life Sciences Technologies
LifesMiracle
LifeSpan International
Life Spring International
Lifestyles USA
LifeMist Home Products LLC
Life International
LifeTek Corporation
Lifetime Income Trusts Ltd
LifeTrends International
LifeVantage
Lifevision
LifeVita. Inc
Life Wave
Life Without Debt
Lighthouse America
Lightyear Alliance
Lightyear Wireless
LikeWear
Likisma Aromatherapy Limited
Likisma Presentations Ltd
LIMU Company LLC
Linen World
Lingerie of Hollywood
Lingua Publications SDB BDH
Linguaphone Institute Ltd
Links Worldwide Inc.
Link2BeFree
Linz Corporation Co Ltd
Lion Best SDN BHD
Liquidity International
Liqua Health Marketing Phils. Corp
Lisa Jean (Division of A Basket Case)
LISM
Little Book Company Ltd
Little Black Dress Company
Little Guy Network
Live Wire Learning Pty Ltd
Living Scriptures, Inc.
Livinity
Liwoton AG
Local Ad Link
Locality Com
Longaberger Company
Longevity Network, Ltd.
Lorimont Enterprises Pty Ltd
Lorraine Lea Linen Pty Ltd
Lotto Magic
Lotus Dragon International CO Ltd
Lotus Learning Private Ltd
Low Carb Gourmet (LifeStyle Gourmet)
LR International
LRL By You
Lucky Charms
Lunesse
Luxe Jewels
Luxelle International Inc.
Luxindo Raya
Lux International AG
Luxor Network SN BHD
Luzier
LWS Freedom
Lyc International
Lydia Home Collection
Lyon Legacy
M2CGlobal
Madame Chic Kosmetika Ab
Madame V
Maddy Moo Creations
Madison Dynamics
Magic Learning Systems
Magnapak
magnumiq (team effort, intl)
Magnus Enterprises Inc
mahadreams
MAHAMAZA.COM
Mail, The
Mail Order 2000
MakeALifeBetter.com
Make It Happen
Make Lots of $ in the Net
MakesParties.com
Maknom Int Inc
Mandura
Mannatech, Incorporated
Manna Valley
Mark I of North America
Market America, Inc.
Market Day Gourmet
Market Depot
Market India
Marketing Makeover Generator
Market Place International
Market to Success
Marlo Quinn
Marpé International
Martinique Beauty Pty Ltd
Mary Kay, Inc.
Mary Kay/Lesley
Marlo Quinn
Master Art Ab
Master's Miracle
Mastery Media Inc / Mastery TV
M.A.T.A.L.
Matchmaker Parties Ltd
Matol Botanical International
Matolindo Primantara
Matrix5
Max.com
Maximum Benefits Company
Max International
MAXeGEN
Max GXL
Maxiform SDN BHD
Maxim International
Maximus Intermediaries Limited
Max Int'l
Maxous
MAXXIS Group, Inc. / MAXXIS 2000
Mayberry America
MBF Discount Card SDN BHD / MBF Sales, LLC
MBU Inc
MCM Networking (M) SDN BHD
Medical Designs Inc
MedSources, Inc.
Mega Health
Mega Holdings Ltd
Megan's Pantry
Melaleuca Inc / The
M.O.M. Team
Melilea International
Melissa Soft Solutions Pvt Ltd
Mellenia
Menage Innovations Inc
Mentoring For Free
Mentor Network, Inc.
Mentor's Club
Mentors In Motion
Metabolife International
Metrin Life USA, Inc.
metro marketing solutions
Metropolitan Aromatherapy Home Party Company
MHC Co Ltd
Mia Bella Scent Sations
MIA Maralyn's Intimate Apparel
Mia Mariu
Michele Baratta atHome
Migalo
Miglio SA Ltd
Mihosugata Homp Co Ltd
Mike Fitzgerald
Miki Corporation
Mikimoto Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
Millennium 2000
Millenium Glotech Sdn. Bhd.
Million Wishes
MILLIONAIRES GROUP
Mill Valley
M.J. Life Enterprises Ltd.
Minebea Shinpan Co Ltd
Mini-IQ
Mintmail
Miracle2LA
miracle4life.com
MIRACLE ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD.
Miracle Mail .com
Miranda's Skin Care Sverige AB
Miraspice AB
Missing Link Education
Miya Inc
ML International
MLM Banner Exchange
MLMDynamite Inc
MLM Community .COM
MLM Search .COM
MLM World News Today
MMF India
MMOGULS
M-Net Telecon AB
Modicare Ltd
Momentum Nutrition & Health / Momentum Health Products, Inc.
Momentum Plus
Momentum Worldwide
Monarch Health Sciences
Monarch Realtors
MonaVie (Monarch Health Sciences)
Mondragon Industries Inc
Moneykey
Moneylegs Mortgage
Moneylogic
Money Manual
Money Makers United
MoneyMatters Network
MoneyTalks
Montaigne (UK) Ltd
Morgan Dane Designs
Morganics
Morinda International Inc (Tahitian Noni Int’l)
Mortgage Medic
MOR Vacations
Motivera AB
Motor Latte, Inc.
Mount Biz
Mountain Gourmet
Movie Club Plus
Moxxor
MPAD Technology Group, Inc.
M.R. Watkins Co Pty Ltd
M Studio Inc
M Tay & Co Pte Ltd
Multiforsa AG
Multiple Income Solutions
Multiple Income Streams
Multi-Pure Drinking Water Systems
Multipurpose Associates
Multiple Streams of Income
Muscle Dynamics Fitness Network, Inc.
Musical Magnets
MusicMovers, Inc.
MVP Network
MWR Systems Ltd
MXI Corp (Xocai)
My4Life
My7Diamonds
My-Friend Co Ltd
My Great Vision
My Leisure Business
Mylene Pvba
MyO3World
My Precious Kid
MySiteInc.com
My Tax Man
MyVideoTalk
My Wireless Rep
My World Marketing C C
MyWorldPLUS
My.WS
N2K International, Inc.
Namyang Aloe Co Ltd
Nanci Corporation
Nano Power Booster USA Inc
Naris Co Ltd
National Agents Alliance
National Alliance for a Debt-Free America, Inc.
National Benefits & Services
National Bodycare
National Calling Card Associates
National Companies, Inc.
National Lending Corporation
National Mortgage Associates
National Safety Associates (Juice Plus+)
Native American Nutritionals
Natur All Plus SA De CV
Natur Health
Natura Cosmeticos S.A.
Natura International
NaturaLab
Natural Air Products / Alpine
Natural Bodycare
Natural Bodylines
Natural Connections
Natural Health Trends / (NHT Global)
Natural SA
Natural World
Natural World of Aloe Vera
NaturaLab
Naturally Anew Comercio Ltd
Naturally Plus
Nature's Aromatherapy
Nature's Bodycare
Nature's Gold International
Nature's Healing Aromatherapy Inc
Natures of Scandinavia
Nature's Own
NatureRich
Nature's Sunshine Products Inc
Nature's Very Best
Nature's Wealth
Nature's Youth Direct
NaturScience
Navin Life Guards & Marketing Private Limited
Nebulis
Nebullis Network
Nefful U.S.A., Inc.
NEFX
Nelson's Secrets
NestFamily
Netcradle LTD
Net Lifestyles
NetmarkAid
Net Masters
Netrix, Inc.
Nettincome.net Limited
Networker2000.com
Networkers Club
Network Marketing Business Journal
Network TNT
Networth Cashflow Systems
Net Worth USA
NeuroGenesis, Inc
Neuro-Health (Becalm'd)
Neways
Newbie Club
New Century Life
New Image International, Inc.
New Inc
New Life Technologies
New Module Farma
New Plan Network(NPN) (AKA:WebShooter Multimedia)
New Precedence LTD
New Quest International
New Resolution Inc (NRI)
New Sun Health
New Vision International, Inc.
New Vision USA, Inc.
Neways International
Newport Ltd
Nexagen USA
NexGen3000.com, Inc.
NextFit
NEXT INDIA
Next Level Club
Nexx, LLC
NFX
NHT Global Inc
Niagara Therapy Manufacturing (Aust) Pty Ltd
Niagra Therapy (NZ) Ltd
Nichiden Co Ltd
Nihon Home Create Inc
Nihon Kenko Zoushin Kenkyukai Canada
Nikken Inc.
Nikken Global, Inc.
Nina McLemore
Nipo Co Ltd
Nippon Bunka Center Co Ltd
Nippon Josephine Co Ltd
Nippon Meard Co Ltd
Nisim International
Noahs Ark Workshop
Noah's Quest
Noevir USA, Inc.
Northern Lights at Home
Nourish The World
Nouveau Cosmeceuticals LLC
Nouveau Riche University
NouvelleHEALTH
NOVAGENIX
Nova Nutria International AG
Nove Chrome
Novia Nutria International AG
Npower Energy Sales Ltd
nPro
NQI / NQIUSA, Inc
NSA (Juice Plus)
NSE
NSGLife
Nu Creations, Inc.
Nubotanic Int.
NuChoice International
Nueworld.com Commerce, Inc.
Nu Gen World SDN BHD
Nuforever International
Nugenix
NuLegacy Rx card
Nu-Life International
Nu LifeStyles, LLC
Nu-Med, Inc.
Nuove Idee SRL
NUPRO
Nuriche
NuSkin Enterprises / Big Planet / Pharmanex / Photomax Studios
Nussentials
Nutrafina
Nutrapower
Nutrend Health Institute, Inc.
NutriCare International
NutriHealth USA
Nutri-Metics International Ltd
Nutrimetics By Avalla
Nutrimetrics North America
NutriSource
Nutri-Stahl Pty Ltd
Nutrition For Life International
NutriSystem Direct
NutriTech
Nutrition For Life
Nutriway Marketing
Nutronics International / The Coral Connection
Nutronix
NuVANTE
NuVerus
Nuvo Cosmeticos
N.Z. New Image SDN BHD
O3World
Oak Co Ltd
Oasis Lifesciences
Oasis Wellness Network
OC Rebates
OceanCity Network
OceanGrown International
October Trading
O Delizioso
OHANA Health & Wellness Company
Ohhira Nutrition (M) SDN BHD
OLA International
OmegaTrends
Omnicup
Omnilife
Omnitrition International
OM SAI ARC (P) LTD.
Once Upon a Charm
Once Upon A Family
OneBode
ONE Group
One Source Worldwide Network
Onejon Commerce Inc
Online Exchange
OnPoint Direct
Onroad Co Ltd
Onyx International
Open Door Mortgage
Open Invitation From
OpTecs
Option Energy
Option Services Ltd
Oragen International
Orange Leads
Oreck Corporation
Orenda International LLC
Orbit the Talking Computer / Orbitalk
Organic and Natural Enterprise Group
Organics Made Easy
Oriflame Cosmetics
Original Solutions Inc
Oro Club
Orovo
OTDirect.com
Our Family Favorites
OurHouse, a Division of EnvirOx, LLC
Our Own Image
Our World Network
Outback Secrets
Oxford Savings Club
Oxyfresh Worldwide, Inc.
OZMOZIZ
P.M. International
PA Associates
paid2purchase.com, LLC
Paint Box Company
Pamper My Baby
Pampered Chef Ltd
Panfele
Pangea Ltd.
Paradigm Health International
Paradigm World Marketing LLC
Paramount Technologies
Paris-Cable
Partners in Vision International, Inc.
PartyGals
Party Juice INC
PartyLite Gifts, Inc.
PassionFire International
Passion Parties by Amy
Passport To Wealth
Patchwork & Preserves
Paychecks For Life
Pay It Forward Marketing
Payline
PCI Integrated Manag. Services
PC's 4 All
Peak Energy Science
Peak Marketing Group Inc
Peak Performance Nutritional Products
People's Empowerment Group
Peoples Network
PeoplesWay.com
Performance Plus Nutritionals
Perfam Cosmeticos Ltda.
Perfect Wealth Formula
Perpetual Income Trust / Lifetime Income Trust
PetLane
Petra Fashions, Inc.
Petromagic
PetShop.biz
PetsParty
Pharmalliance
Pharmanex
PHD Products
PHENIX ( A UNIT OF GEET MARKETING PVT.LTD)
Phoenix Educational Systems Inc
Phoenix Trading
PHOENIX USA
Phone Broadcast Club
Photomax
Physicians Research Laboratories
Picture Perfect Scrapbook Company LLC
PictureRite Corp
Pierre Laforest GmbH
Pierre Lang
Pink Papaya LLC
Pinnacle Comms. Int'l. Inc.
Pinnacle Quest International
Pinnacle Plus
Pioneerbizz.com
PixMeUp
PlantMakers
Plantronics
Platinum Travel Club
PlayCheckDirect
Plaza & Janes Editores S.A.
please mum
Plexus Pink
Plexus Wireless
PM-International Nutrition and Cosmetics
Poga Moonga
Pola Inc.
Polydor Culture Club
Pony Express
Popular Club, Inc.
Postie Fashions
Powerful Warrior Group
Power of Nature
Power 2 Marketing LLC
Powerline Marketing Group
Power Mall
PowerPlusMPG (Dreamlife Products)
Power Pops
Power Wave Marketing
PRAI Beauty Events
Precis, Inc.
Preeya Home Study (P) LTD
Premier Designs, Inc.
Premier Health Link
Premiere Conferencing
PremierNet Plus
Premium Connections, Inc.
Pre-Paid Legal Services Inc.
Prepaid Online
President Natural Industrial Corp
Pres-Les
Prex Co Ltd
PriceNetUSA
Prima Rosa
PrimeBank Ltd
PrimeBuy International
Primequest International
Primerica Financial Services (PFS) / AL Williams
Primeristar
Princess House, Inc.
Princess Pearl Co Ltd
Private Quarters
Private X Collection AB
ProAutoResponder.Com
ProBuilderPlus
ProCard International
Procosmetics
Profit Central Inc
Product Driven
Pro Image International
Project 21
Project 60
Project Internet
Project Wellness
Projoba International
Pro Image International
PROLIFE GmbH
Prolifehealthcare Ltd
Pro-MA Systems
ProMedX Health Inc
Pro Monde Travel
PRo Net Communications
Pro-Sales Direct Pty Ltd
Pro Shop at Home
Prospect Planet
Prosper Club
Prosperity Automated System
Pro Star International
Pro Star Nutrition
ProStep Inc
PRONET INC
Pro Travel Network
Proven Formala
prowealthSOLUTIONS
Pro Young International
PRSI
PRT Travel
Prudent Concept Marketing Pvt. Ltd.
PS I Love You
Psix Limited
PTF Financial
Public Gold
Publifacil
PUJA Syncotex (I) LTD
Purchase Plus Buyer's Group
PurchasePro
PureInvestor
Purely Gourmet LLC
Pure Romance by Sheila
Pureworks
PURSEnality Etcetera
Purse Party Inc
Qing Mei Inc
Qi Technologies
Qivana
QuakeDog Inc
Qual-Life
Quantum Leap
Quantum International P Ltd
Quantum Wellness
Quest Group International
Quest International Ltd
Quest IV Health Products
QuestNet
Quiet Place for You
Quiet Places
Quorum Global
Rachael International
RadioFreeCash
Ragged Bears Publishing
RAG NETWORKS
Rainbow Enzymes Inc.
Rainbow Systems / Rexaire (vacuum cleaners)
Rainbow World
Rajat Consumer Services Pvt Ltd
Raj Kamal Tours & Travels
Rapido
RAISING WEALTH TREE MARKETING PVT LTD.
Rawleigh International Ltd.
RBC Life Sciences
Rbcrbc Multimarketing Pvt Ltd
RBID
RCM Business
Rday Health & Wealth
REAL ESTATE MLM . BIZ
Real Life Solutions Inc.
Realtopbuildwell (p) Limited
Redin International Pty Ltd
Red Rock Naturals
ReddRox
Reel Thing
Reeva Forman Pty Ltd
ReferralWare International
Regal Greetings & Gifts Inc
Regal Ware, Inc.
Reid Enterprises
ReishiGo,USA Inc.
Rejuvenate Worldwide
Reliv International, Inc.
RemedyBlue
Rena Ware International, Inc.
Renaissance For Life
Rennaissance – the Tax People
Repspace
Resorts 360 Vacation Club
Resource A Day
Retire Quickly Corporation
Retire On Spending
Retire Quickly Corp.
REV180
Revell SDN BHD
Reverse Funnel System
ReVita
Revolution Forever Marketing Pvt. Ltd
Revolution Road
Reward Co Ltd
Rexair, Inc. (Rainbow Vacuums)
Rexall Showcase International
RFI
R-Garden Internationale
Riccar Company Ltd
Rich Plan of Florida
Richmont Direct
Ricoh Educational Equipment CO Ltd
Ricoh Elmex Corporation
Ride-on-Music
RideOn Records
Rifiotex SRL
RightLife
RightSize
Right Solution
Rising International
RITZ MARKETING CONCEPT PVT. LTD.
RJJ Co Ltd
RMC Group Inc
RMP INFOTEC PVT LTD
Rocky Mountain International Silver and Gold, Inc.
Rodan and Fields
Rommanel
Rosemary Collections
Rotoplay
Royal BodyCare, Inc.
Royal Cosmo Co Ltd
Royal Farms
Royal Freedom
Royal Network
Royal Prestige (Hy Cite Corp)
ROYAL VISION MARKETING PVT.LTD.
SafeLeads
Safer Places
Sahara Care House
Saladmaster, Inc.
Sales In Minutes
San Michele Fashions Pty Ltd
Sani Clean Co Ltd
Sankaido Co Ltd
San-Mark Co Ltd
Sante & Beaute International Holdings Ltd
SANVI OPPORTUNITIES
Sara Lee DE
Sarah Coventry
Sargem Jewellery Pty Ltd
Save It and Make It
Savory Naturals
Scents4Relaxation
Scent-Sations Inc (Mia Bella)
Scents Unlimited
Scentsy Inc
Scentura Creations
SciMedica
ScrapBiz
Scriptures
Sea Alive
SeaAloe
Sea Biotics
Seaborne, LLC
Seasilver USA
Sea Energy
Second Nature Bath Body
Secrets of Millionaires
Secure America
Secure Independence
Secure Life
Secure Lives
Security Network Inc
Self Indulgence
Send Out Cards.com
SeneGence International
Sensaria Natural Bodycare, Inc.
SERENITY
Seriesse International
ServiceMaster
Set For Life Inc
Setting Traditions
Sevea
Sex Toys for Wholesale
sfi marketing group
Shade Clothing COllection
Shades of Color
Shaklee Corporation
Shanghai Lanfar Trade Ltd
Shanghai Nu Skin Daily Use & Health Co Ltd
Shaperite Concepts
Shape Your Future
SharedProfit.com
Share the Wealth
SharpSigns
Shine Co Ltd
Shoppers Central
Shop To Earn
ShopWurld
ShrimpUSA / Shrimp Boat USA
SHS Group Mkt (P) LTD
Shuang Hor Enterprise (Taiwan) Co., Ltd
Shure Pets Inc
Sibi
Sibu Inc.
Signature HomeStyles
Silit France
Silpada Designs
Silver Buyers Club
Silver Cache
Silver Freedom Coin Inc.
Silver Snowball
Simple Graces
Simplexity
Simplibiz.com
Simply Because
Simply Divine
SimplyFun LLC
Simply Sushi
Simply Successful Pty Ltd
Singles Club No. 50
Singles Resource Network
SISEL International
Six Figure Income / SFI Marketing Group
Skin Spa Therapies
SkyBiz
Skycom
Sky Music Private Limited
SkyQuestCom Pte Ltd
Slender Now
Slick Smiles
Slim Body Lifestyle
Slumber Parties
Smart Circle International
Smart-Mart, Inc.
Smart Responder.COM
Smartmail.biz
SmartNetworker
Smart Travel
SmartWay To Wealth
SMC Specialty Merchandise Corp
Smile Education
SMK
SND Marketing Pvt.Ltd
Snow Fresh
Soaring Eagle Ventures
S.O.B.M
SoftWebOnline
Solana International
Soma Co Ltd
SomaLife International
Sony Creative Co Ltd
Soteria Corp. / It Works Marketing
SouldEcor
SoulPurpose
Souls Essentials
Sound Technology Sales Corp
Sound Travels
Southern Heritage Inc
Southern Living at Home
South Main Designs
Southwestern Company
Spa Destinations
Spa Girl Parties Inc.
Spa Sensations Ltd
Spa Style
Sparks International
SPECTRUM LIFESTYLES
Spedia
Speedial Limited
Spick and Span
Spider Web System
SponsorDaddy
Spread The Word Ministries
Sportron International
Sportsnuts.com
Springboard
Springtex Limited
Springtree Company
Spring Wellness
Stamp Affair
Stampin' Up!
Stanley Home Products
Stanhome SPA
Star 2000 Online
Starfire International
Star International
Starlight International
StarScapes
STC Leaders Inc.
Steak Buyers Club
Steel My Heart
Stella & Dot
StemTech HealthSciences Inc
Sterling Bay
Sterling Life India
Stimulife
Story Teller
Story Time Felts
Stoxrus
Strauss Heart Drops
Strong Future International
Strategies for Success
Stream Energy
Streamline International
Studio Dee
Stuff a Friend
Success Motivation Institute
Success University
Suddenly Slender / The Body Wrap
Summit International Inc
Sun Alpha Co Ltd
Sun Charm
Sundew International
Sun Hope International Corporationa
Sundrier Mexico Inc
Sunjell
Sunless Expressions
Sunpak Corporation
Sunrider International
Sunrise Direct
Sunset Candle Company
Sunset Gourmet Food Company
Superlife
SupraLife International
Supra/Life Soaring Eagle Ventures Inc.
Suprederm International Co Ltd.
Surfing2Cash
SurfWithUs.net
Sureal International
Sunshine Products
SurveyScout.com
Surya Pagoda Mas
Susquehanna Soaps and Sundries
SVPS LTD
Sweet Berry Designs
Sweet Celebrations
Sweet Living
Sweet Prairie Soap Company
Swiss Colony Occasions
SwissJust Corporation
Symmetry Corporation
Symmetry Direct
Symmetry International
Sympatico Boydworks Pty Ltd
Synaura
Syndicate Management Services
Synecorp.com
Synergy WorldWide / Nature's
Syntec, Inc.
Syntek Global Inc
Tabolizer, LLC
Tahitian Noni International
Taiwan Naturally Plus Co Ltd
Taiway Marketing (M) SDN BHD
Taiway MLM International Co Ltd
TAKE FIVE MATRIX
Take Shape for Life Inc. / Medifast
Take Shape For Life (Medifast)
Talent Warehouse
TALISMAN
TalkAllDay-Net
Talk Fusion
Tall Poppy Creations Pty Ltd
TamaNoni, Inc.
Tanner Companies LLC
TapCity
Tara Prima Megah
TARRAH Cosmetics, Inc.
TaserNetwork
Taste D-Vine
Taste of Gourmet
Taste of Home Entertaining
Tastefully Simple, Inc.
TaxRefund1040.com
TBA Two
TBN - The Benefits Network
TBS Britanica Co Ltd
TDK Core Co Ltd
Tealightful Treasures
Team Beachbody
Team Effort International
Team Everest
Team Life Changes
Team National/ National Companies
TeamNET International
Teaporia
Tel3
Tel-a-Nation.com
Telco Global Communications (UK) Ltd
Telecard International
Telecom Global Communications LTD
Telecom-Pros
Telecom Solutions
Telehop
Telephone Information Systems (Pleasure Time)
TeleWrx / Converge Global, Inc.
Telme
Tenpaid Co Ltd
Teraforma Health
TerraCeutics LLC
Terra Mezzo
Tesko Educational Systems Co Ltd
T.F.A. In-Home Inc
That's My Baby Pet Parties, Inc.
Thevenin S.A.
Thirty-One Gifts
Thordson Pictura Verlag Ag
Three Girls Who
Thrivent Financial at Home
Thumbs Up
Thyme In The Kitchen
Tianshi Health Products, Inc.
Tickle Your Fancy
Tidal Wave
Tidings of Love
Tiens
Time To Celebrate Home
TIP's Inc.
TIRUPATI NETWORK MARKETING (P) LTD.
Tiscali
TJ Clark
Tlc Insurance India PVT. LTD.
TMII
Tokyo Gas Co Ltd
Tomboy Tools Inc
Tom Danley’s Tape of the Month
Tomorrow's Treasures / Memory Bank
Too Cute Cake
The Topline
Top Line Creations
Topp Industri AB
Tornado Ag
Total Body Wellness
Total Life Changes (TLC)
Total Link, The
Total Reach Marketing SDN BHD
Total Success Solutions Inc
Totalife International Co Ltd
Totally Tropical Interiors, Ltd.
Totalnet Plus
Total Wellness International
Touch of Tahiti
Touchstone Crystal Inc
Tow Angel, LLC
Toward Ultimate Financial Freedom
Towel Buddies
Traci Lynn Fashion Jewelry
Trade Exchange Network
Traditions Inc
Traffic Directory .COM
Traffic Oasis USA
Traffic Swarm
TrafficWave.net LLC
Traidcraft Plc
Transform America
Trans-Global Investments Universal
TransNet Connect, Inc.
TranSynd
Travel Almost Free
Travelencia
Travel Legacy International
Traveling Vineyard
Travel Makes You Happy
TravelMax International
Travelogia
TravelOne International
Travel Promotions International
Travel Reaction
Travelstar
Travelworks International
Traverus Travel
Treasure Traders International
Trek Alliance
TrendMark International, Inc.
Trilogy Essentials International Inc.
TriLokin International, Inc
Trim International
Trimurtiics
Trinkets N Dreams
Trio Co Ltd
TriStar Enterprises, LLC
TriStar Online Sales Corporation / Suble Energy Solutions
TriUnity International
Trivani International
TriVita Way International
Tru Chocolate
TruDynamics (Travel Dynamics)
TRUE MATRIX
True Wealth Creations
Trump Network
Trusted Health Products
T-Shirts With A Personal Touch
TSWBIZ
Tupperware Corporation
Turning Point
TuRobotNetwork
Two Sisters Gourmet
Ubifone
UCAN2 Opportunity, Inc.
UCC TotalHome
UCS (dba) Americans for Constitutional Action
U Design Jewelry
Ulimate Asset Protection
Ultimate Energy
UltimateMatch
Ultra Corp
UltraeStore
Ultralife, LTD
UltraLuster
Undercover Records
UndercoverWear Collection
Uni-Body International
Unicity International, Inc.
Unicity Network, Inc.
Unilife International Co Ltd
Unimax
Unique Baby Boutique inc
Unique Opportunities Inc
Unique S.A.
Unique Solutions
United First Financial
United Green Marketing
United Herbal Sciences, Inc
United Net Services
United Prosper Club
United Super Account Program
Univera Life Sciences
Universal Direct
Universal Lifestyles
Universal Wellness Network
Universal Network
Uppercase Living
U-Profit
URI International
Urilife
USAloe
USANA Health Sciences, Inc
Usborne Books At Home
US DIAL1
US Health Advisors
U.S. Safety & Engineering Corporation
USTELETRICITY NETWORK
Usteletricity Network
Utility Warehouse Discount Club
uVme
UWinFinancial
Vachaud Distribution S.A.
Valedalife
Vanda
Vanilla Gold Accumulation Plan
Vanstahl International SA
Vantel Pearls in the Oyster
Vaxa International
VBS India Ltd.
VCI MARKETING (P) LTD.
Vemma Nutrition Company
Vera Corp World Netsafe
Vergance
Versatile
Vestige Marketing Pvt. Ltd.
Viamore Corporation
ViaViente Ltd
Vibe Anti-aging
Vibrant Performance
Victorian Memories
Village Peddler & The Iron Country Store
Vintage Wines Direct Pty Ltd
VIP Domotec Italia SRL
Virgin Cosmetics Company
Virtual World Direct
Virtual World Trust
Virtually Free Internet
ViSalus Sciences
Visee International
Vision 20/20 (thinAir Wireless)
Vision For Life International
Visions Group of America
Vision International People Group
Vision Quest Worldwide Inc
Vision Travel
VitaBorn
Vitacheck
Vita Craft Corporation
Vitacube
Vita Genesis
Vitagenex
Vital-C Health Products International, Inc.
Vital Force Technology LLC
Vital Life
VitaLife 2000 / Nature's Youth
Vitality Corporation / LifeChoice Corp.
Vitality Labs
Vitallity Life Choice
Vitalus
Vitamark International
VITAMIN POWER, INC.
Vitamist
VitaNet, LLC
Viva America Marketing Taiwan
Viva Life Science, Inc.
Viva Marketing
Viva Toxic Free
Viviane Woodard Skincare
Vivannes Collection Australia Pty Ltd
Vizion One
VMCSatellite Dish Network
VM Direct (Helloworld)
Voice-Tel
VoiceWave Team
Volare AB
Vooka Technology
Vortexity
Vorwerk USA Company, LP
Votre Vu
Voyager Group Inc.
VR Tech Marketing Group
Wachter's Organic Sea Products
Waiora USA
Wallstreet Prophet
Wardson International
Warm Spirit, Inc.
Washington Softwares LTd.
Watch 24 Pty Ltd
WaterOz
Waters Phillippines
Watkins Incorporated
Waves International
WBG holding
Wealthening.com
Wealth Masters International
Wealth Pools International
WebProsperity
Webs to Multilevel
Weed Music Distribution Service
Weekenders USA, Inc.
Wellness Associates
WellnessDistributors.Com, LLC
Wellness International (WIN)
Wellness Movement Corp
WellnessOneWorld
Wellness Premium Plus
West Bend Company
West Bend Cookware
West Coast Weight Loss
West House Transport (S&E) Ltd
Western Marketing
wfhTravel
White Lily Candles
Wholefood Farmacy
Wicker Plus, Ltd.
Wildtree Herbs, Inc.
WillauTronic LLC
Wilton At Home
Winalite International
WineShop at Home
WININDIA Network Marketing Private Limited
Win Network
Wisco Co Ltd
Wodafo Biotech R&D INC
womens wealth and wellness
Wonder Lite
Wood's Potpourri
Woofgangs
Woongjin Coway Development Co
Wordpress Project
Word of Mouth
Word To The Nations
WorkSmart Ltd
World Ale Inc
World Book, Inc.
World Book Childcraft
World Book Learning Journey
World Class Network (WCN)
World Connect
World Games - WGI
World Golf Corp
World Group Securities
World Marketing Alliance (WMA) / World Financial Group (WFG) / National
Lending Corp. (NLC) / Aegon Financial Group World
World Maruhati
WorldMatic
World Net Inc
World Net International
World Perfume
Worldprofit Inc.
World's Standard of Online Poker
WorldVentures Holdings, LLC
WorldxChange Corporation
WORLDWIDE
World Wide Alliance Corp (WWA USA)
World Wide Internet Marketing
World Wide Link Inc (dba) TheWWWLink
Worldwide Network Incorporated
Worldwide Wealth Creators
Worth
Wowgreen
Winlife Healthcare Inc
WQdirect.com
WT Powers
Wynlife
X2 Consulting Pty Ltd
XanGo LLC
XELR8
X-One Co Ltd
Xocai Healthy Chocolate
Xooma Worldwide
XPI Online
XtremeHealth Formulas
Xymetri
Xzotto
Yates Security Holdings Ltd
Yellowbubble.com
YOBISC
Yoffi Fine Jewelry
YOR
You5.com
YOUNGER LIVING, INC.
Youngevity, Inc.
Young Living Essential Oils
Your Family First
YourNetPlus.Com, Inc.
Your Promised Land
Youthflow Corporation
YTB Travel Inc. (YourTravelBiz, YTB International)
Yubi Co Ltd
Yves Rocher Direct Selling
Zavita
ZeBlooms, Inc.
Zenith 4 the Planet
ZenZuu
Zepter INT (UK) LTD
Zermat International LLC
Ziami GmbH
Zibycom.com
Zija International
ZINGIT.COM
Zippi.com
ZizBiz
Zoegetics
Zonenet Online
Zrii
zWallet
ZU-B International
Zurvita
Some
Sources: 1,
2, 3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16,
17,
18,
19,
20,
21,
22,
23,
24
www.ftc.gov, www.sec.gov
|
|
|
| Links
and Resources
If
you stumbled in the back way because you were
searching for info on MLMs
[multi-level marketing organizations] or SALES
JOBS [particularly in the financial, real
estate, personnel staffing, or auto
rental industries], then
you might as well read this entire site from the beginning
-- much of it applies to you as well.
Inclusion
or exclusion of a link implies neither endorsement nor condemnation
of its subject or source. Link lists are by no means all inclusive.
I.
Reporting Fraud / Legal
-
Reporting
Fraud.
- Federal
Trade Commission (FTC).
Submit a complaint about a company. The FTC protects consumers
against fraud and has an interest in stopping illegal pyramid
schemes. While the FTC does not resolve individual consumer
problems, your complaint helps them investigate fraud and
can lead to law enforcement action.
- Better
Business Bureau. Complaints against a company
can earn it an "unsatisfactory" rating in the locality
in which it was reported. Keep in mind that the main purpose
of the BBB is to facilitate resolving complaints
against businesses, not condemn them.
- FINRA
- File A Regulatory Tip. (FINRA used to be
NASD.) Perhaps you have knowledge of illegal practices by
a manager, or your commission checks have been withheld for
one reason or another. If you are aware of unfair practices
or specific instances of abusive conduct or rules violations
in the securities industry, FINRA wants to know about it.
- SEC
(Securities & Exchange Commission) - File a Complaint.
Attorneys in the Division of Enforcement evaluate
information and tips concerning violations of the federal
securities laws.
- IRS
- Report Tax Fraud.
If you believe a firm is misclassifying its employees as independent
contractors, you may file a tip. If you feel you've been misclassified
as an independent contractor to your detriment, submit form
SS-8.
The IRS can audit the firm and impose heavy fines on those
caught misclassifying employees as well as save you paying
taxes you aren't liable for to begin with.
- YOUR
STATE'S DEPT. OF REVENUE - Report Tax Fraud. As above.
Links to all are here.
- YOUR
STATE'S DEPT. OF INSURANCE - Report Insurance Fraud.
Links to all of them are here.
For insurance-related issues, contact your state's Department
of Insurance. Examples of insurance fraud that might be reported
would be inducing policyowners to lie on their applications
in order to influence rates, or even using private information
from those applications to recruit the policyowner as a rep
(yes, it's happened).
- YOUR
STATE'S UNEMPLOYMENT OFFICE - Obtain Unemployment Benefits.
Ask
for determination of employee classification (employee and
not independent contractor) so you may obtain unemployment
benefits. Each state sets its own standards for determination.
Links to all states are here.
- YOUR
STATE'S DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - Report Labor Violations.
List of them here.
Report possible misclassification of employee as independent
contractor, ask for a determination.
- YOUR
STATE'S ATTORNEY GENERAL - Report Legal Violations.
Links to all of them are here.
Report suspected fraud to your state's Attorney General, who
can investigate and prosecute possible illegal pyramid schemes
(those fall under CONSUMER PROTECTION).
- EMPLOYMENT
AD MEDIA. IMPORTANT!
If you were recruited through a newspaper or online job search
site, report the exact nature of the deception occurring within
its media. Most media feel a public responsibility to remove
fraudulent job postings and will do so if enough complaints
are received. (See Monster.com's policy here.)
Many media guidelines state that a job advertiser must offer
bona fide employment, not an independent contractor or commission
gig (these must be posted under "business opportunities"
or "sales positions"). Remember, scammer
firms cannot remain solvent if they cannot recruit,
so your participation in this can aid in shutting them down
when other regulatory actions fail or take too long in catching
up.
- DSA
(Direct Selling Association). If your company
is a member
of DSA (for example, Primerica), then it must technically
abide DSA's "Code
of Ethics". File a "Code
Complaint". Note that although the DSA requires a
one-year pending membership period during which it examines
the potential member "to ensure compliance with all provisions
of DSA’s Code of Ethics" (*),
a number of their members have been found by courts and fined
by the FTC as engaging in pyramid schemes (Equinox, Omnitrition,
YourTravelBiz, etc.).
- Legal:
Activism.
- U.S.
House of Representatives.
Find your local legislator. Write to him or her in support
of legislation that will protect consumers of jobs against
businesses that misrepresent opportunities.
- National
Association of Attorney Generals.
Locate your state's attorney general. Write to him or her
in support of legislation that will protect consumers of
jobs against businesses that misrepresent opportunities.
- The
"Anti-Pyramid Promotional Scheme Act of 2003"
(HR 1220). Support
modification of this now-dead bill, in whatever
form it returns to haunt us, to protect consumers of jobs
against businesses that misrepresent opportunities. Beware
deceptive language!
- Pyramid
Scheme Alert
does NOT support the "Anti-Pyramid Promotional
Scheme Act of 2003" bill. See
also this
page. Promoted by the DSA, tricky language is:
- "'Pyramid
scheme' means any operation in which a participant
gives consideration for the right to receive compensation
that is derived primarily from the recruitment of
other persons as participants into the operation
rather than from the sale of goods, services,
or intangible property to participants or
by participants to others." Opponents
point out that the bolded language effectively
legalizes product-based pyramid schemes and
renders meaningless the FTC's 1979 "Amway
Safeguards" ([...] "the '70% rule'
and '10 customer rule' are meaningless if commissions
are paid based on a distributor's wholesale sales
[sales to scheme participants], and not based on
actual retail sales"). The argument here
is that MLMs that better compensate recruiting over
retailing to consumers outside the scheme are only
encouraging participants to get rich off their downlines'
backs (as with a pyramid scheme) than to actually
sell products to the public at large. Fight to defeat
this bill (and any future incarnation) as it reads.
You may sign up for Pyramid Scheme Alert's
Petition
which urges the President and Congress to launch
investigations of the FTC and SEC, which have for
years "ignored, allowed or protected pyramid
and Ponzi [scam] operators."
- The
Direct
Selling Association (DSA) supports
HR 1220; see their
page (archived) on it. Their
current page on it is here;
note that it differs. In
particular, the old page included language [from a 1974
FTC ruling] that found in MLM an "intolerable
potential to deceive". I can understand why
they reconsidered keeping that on their page. More about
DSA is available in the MLMs section
below.
- Legal:
Prosecution.
- Legal:
Defense.
- California
Anti-SLAPP Project.
Find out how to protect yourself against "Strategic
Lawsuits Against Public Participation." Includes list
of states with anti-SLAPP laws.
- MlmSurvivor.com
Article on "SLAPPs".
Interesting examination of Amway's
attempts to protect its image. Supports
argument that a company need only name or continue to
name critical website operators as defendants in unrelated
cases to drain their finances and force closure of their
sites. All cases were dismissed, but most site operators
were harrassed into closed their sites because of mounting
legal defense costs.
- The
Anonymous Internet Foundation, Inc.
May be able to help SLAPP targets obtain legal representation,
even on a pro bono (for the public good) or reduced fee
basis. Update 2009: Site does not appear to be maintained
but is still active.
See
the Networking
page for a list of message boards you may use to complain about
your firm as well.
II.
Research Your Company
- IRS
Criteria for Independent Contractors vs. Employees.
Make sure your firm has classified you correctly. Ask the IRS
to make determination by filling out Form
SS-8.
- Local
Courts.
If you've got an inkling that the
firm could be crooked, don't miss this step. Call
the court in the firm's jurisdiction and ask the clerk to look
up cases in which the firm's name is mentioned. A large number
of cases could certainly indicate trouble. A case with a large
number of plaintiffs could be a class-action suit. Some courts
provide past court cases free online. For others, you can request
print copies for a reasonable fee. It's public record. (Unfortunately,
a firm can use a plaintiff's "independent contractor"
status to get out of being named in the lawsuit, so you still
might miss any signs of wrongdoing.)
- SEC's
Investment Advisor Public Disclosure site (FIRMS
ONLY). Do the "Investment Advisor Search" on your firm.
Note any marks on their "Disclosure Reporting Pages."
- SEC
(Securities & Exchange Commission). Use the "search"
function to research your firm. Be sure to put the firm's name
in quotes. Note any regulatory actions. If you're interested in
a bit of background about the SEC, check out Reality
at the SEC (archived). Author Gary Goodenow worked
for the SEC as attorney and offers
opinions on why it is so difficult to shut down scammers.
Fascinating site from a former insider.
- FINRA
(used to be NASD; search Individuals & Firms). Look up your
firm or broker and make sure they are registered in your state
(use FINRA's Brokercheck).
If the broker offers securities and yet is not listed at all with
the NASD, BEWARE. If you will be paying for licensing, check FINRA's
rates for licenses you need and don't overpay for hidden training
fees.
- Better
Business Bureau. The Better Business Bureau is
not necessarily a good source for learning about a company's reputation
with employees, but you can learn how the business treats
its clients. Complaints stay active for a very short period of
time, however, and full individual complaints are not publicly
searchable. At worst, the company gets an "unsatisfactory"
rating, and then only in the locality in which it was reported.
BBBs are discrete localized entities, not a single national watchdog
entity. Keep in mind that the main purpose of the BBB is to resolve
complaints against businesses, not condemn them. (A negative
opinion of the BBB can be found in the red link text on this
RipOffReport.com page -- it alleges that BBB membership is
bought, not earned. However, the same can be said of RipOffReport,
which solicits
businesses to pay to join their "Corporate
Advocacy Program", which then conveniently improves the
business's image on the site. For instance, much-maligned Primerica,
which appears to have over 600 complaints on RipOffReport, now
has text on each complaint page indicating that it is "approved"
by RipOffReport as a company that consumers may have confidence
in!)
- Switchboard.com.
Locate people you worked with at the firm to get their stories.
You may not be alone.
- See
the Networking
page for a list of message boards you may use for research as
well.
- Also
check Section V. (Complaints Against Specific
Financial Services Companies) below to see if your company
has earned its own critical website(s). You may want to add your
own complaints there.
- Search
the Internet. Don't forget that you can target search
results better by including the company name in "quotes".
If you suspect the business is unethical, do a second search including
words such as 'scam', 'fraud', or 'lawsuit' after the quoted company
name. However, keep in mind that many websites are forced
to close by the companies they're complaining about (SLAPP
lawsuits), so the Internet can be a shaky way
to find complaints! Note that you can often find archives of a
website via www.archive.org.
III.
MLMs (multi-level marketing organizations)
Also called: network marketing, direct
marketing or direct sales, matrix marketing, viral marketing, referral
marketing, dual marketing, consumer direct marketing, "home-based
businesses". Whether you are pro-MLM or against, you should
read this entire section to learn why MLM has long been associated
with fraud and how you can protect yourself.
IIIa.
My Opinion on MLMs (and companies operating like MLMs)
This
site was not designed to be specifically an MLM bash site,
but one cannot help but note that even "reputable"
MLMs have been unable to escape stinging criticism and even
lawsuits from unhappy recruits and consumers. Recruits'
feelings about MLMs are shockingly polar. Those who
love MLMs appear to me to be: still in the earlier stages
of positive emotion whipped up by their upline and organizations;
earning a little and unwilling to give up hopes of riches;
satisfied with a small supplemental income if they in fact
aren't continuing to lose money every month; or one of the
overwhelmingly small number who are making an income of any
substantial size. Their most common defense of their company
is that those who fail "didn't try hard enough."
Those who hate MLMs are generally those who "failed"
and feel absolutely betrayed when even the most modest dreams
promoted by the company don't pan out after they follow the
plan diligently, their back-breaking hard work often leaving
behind little more than destroyed finances and shattered familial/social
relationships.
MLMs
often have meteoric rises and fantastic sales volumes,
but I tend to believe the only reason they are able to attain
those volumes is by continually mining new recruits by setting
unrealistic expectations (for the vast majority). If product
is moved, it appears to be because of pressure to make sales
goals by obtaining mercy/trust sales to friends and family
and other downline recruits with the same goal, not because
the product has value on the open market. MLMs are able to
avoid shouldering the cost of their sales force (salaries/wages,
taxes, insurance, etc.) by classifying them as "business
owners" or "independent contractors", often
by promoting "fantastic" tax write-offs,
independence, and dreams of wealth to them while slurring
traditional brick-and-mortar businesses. (For the record,
the IRS says you can't generally operate an unprofitable "business"
out of your home with the "hopes" that it will pay
off, and then deduct the cost and operation of a personal
residence/home office; pay your family as employee write-offs;
write off the family car; deduct travel, meals, and entertainment
under the guise that everyone is a potential client; etc.
See here.)
Many distributors not only buy the products but are encouraged
to pay for the company's "motivational" conventions
and materials in order to "build their businesses".
Additionally, MLMs are often able to dodge costly legal actions,
holding the distributors responsible for infractions. The
loss of a distributor doesn't hurt, since that distributor's
downline is simply reabsorbed, and recruiting is constant
anyway. Traditional expensive advertising costs are minimized
or eliminated. I am
not surprised when MLMs show up in Inc. Magazine's
500 fastest-growing privately held companies list (The Inc.
500) or Fortune Magazine's list (The Fortune
500) or Forbes Magazine's 500 (Forbes 500),
if in the insurance industry, they rate well on A.M. Best's
financial strength list for some years. (Search The Inc. 500
here;
search A.M. Best here.
Fortune's lists are available only to subscribers.) They tout
this as an incredible honor, but keep in mind how
they're doing it. Meteoric growth often only
happens because consumers join a feeding frenzy based on deceptive
income claims, and the promoters try to rake in as much as
possible before getting caught!
MLMs
sell (or have sold before they went bankrupt) most everything
you can think of: vitamins and herbal supplements, cosmetics,
perfume, clothing, lingerie, jewelry, real estate, internet
service, computers, phone service and phone cards, insurance,
securities, toys, legal services, auto rentals, foods, beverages,
pet supplies, travel services, water filters, vacuum cleaners,
greeting cards, art, candles, cutlery, cookware, security
systems, books, encyclopedias, and even ostrich farms! One
would think that the incredible savings on overhead would
allow MLMs to sell these products for far less than same class
retail products, but I personally have yet to see that be
the case. MLMs must pay many layers of commissions on their
products instead, and that comes out of the buyer's pocket.
Many MLMers find their products difficult to retail because
buyers find them too expensive, or have never heard of them,
or find them to be of an inferior quality, so the
main if not only source of buyers is not retail customers
but either other MLMers attempting to build businesses or
friends and family buying just to help those MLMers build
businesses.
Even
then, note that these "business owners"
do not really own their own businesses and have far
less control than they are led to believe. Any behaviors
that the MLM deems "infractions" risk the recruit's
losing his business and having his downline reabsorbed. His
"business" does not exist apart from its relationship
with the MLM. (Review the "Independent
Contractor?" section of this site.)
Note
that in 1990, only 25% of the Direct Sellers Association's
(DSA) members were multi-level, as opposed to the
traditional single-level (*).
As of 2005, over 77% of DSA members were multi-level.
By 2009, about 97% were multi-level.
It makes sense to go multi-level -- there is a greater chance
of profit when your sales overrides extend several or many
levels down (or even indefinitely), instead of one level as
with single-level direct sales organization. However, multi-level
also puts more stress on recruiting downlines so higher-up
participants retire early and rich instead of retailing single-level
to non-MLM participants. It also encourages
turning a blind eye to market saturation such that
the lower levels never have the chance to "get rich",
in effect threatening collapse of a pyramid built on unattainable
dreams and not retail sales.
The
1979 FTC ruling on Amway required the "10
customer rule", or that a distributor must sell to 10
retail customers (not other distributors) per month to qualify
for a performance bonus, in order to establish that sales
were not simply fueled by dreams of riches as is characteristic
of a pyramid scheme. However, a senior manager of Amway’s
distributor relations section acknowledged that bonus checks
get paid to distributors who have no retail sales and that
it was up to the Direct Distributor to decide if this
rule should be enforced (*).
Amway in effect is relying on the independent contractor status
of distributors to shield itself; after all, it's their
business.
Once
a company has been an MLM, it appears to be hard to compete
selling traditional retail. Distributors don't want to compete
with retailers and regard any company attempts at retailing
as backstabbing. Avon dabbled briefly with
it before distributor backlash changed its mind (*).
According to mlmWatchdog.com,
Tupperware's more aggressive 2003 experiment
with selling through Target stores backfired -- sales plummeted
as distributors defected. This only tends to lend further
credibility to my theory that many MLM products cannot compete
on their own merits in the open retail market; it must be
the "business opportunity" that pushes sales. The
product might be a fine high-end product or absolute rubbish,
but on the open market its demand is equalized.
The
simplest solution in
my opinion for stamping out pyramid schemes of ALL
sorts, should legislators finally demonstrate some
brains, guts and integrity, would be to outlaw sales
structures in which commissions penetrate more than one level
deep altogether instead of creating more enforcement work
for already-overextended tax-supported regulatory and law
enforcement agencies, as essentially happened in
the 1979 FTC ruling on Amway. This would ensure that market
saturation is accounted for so that overwhelmingly unattainable
dreams of riches cannot drive the business; the focus would
return to retail sales, as it was with single-level direct
sales. Hand in hand should be legislation requiring
that new recruits be paid a base salary (not draw!)
plus commission in order to eliminate the abuse of reps as
misclassified independent contractors. If the business's focus
is the sale of its products, it should shoulder related expenses
and responsibilities instead of foisting them onto aninexperienced
and unsophisticated sales force who don't understand the ramifications.
That includes advertising (and not relying on the reps' friends
and families for sales) as well. Yes, this would be essentially
the end of MLM and a return to business as usual.
In
short, I believe MLMs (and MLM type companies) are simply
outdated, unnecessary, and exploitive distribution systems
that cost the company next to nothing to run and falsely inflate
its sales volume and bottom line, selling as many dreams and
motivational baggage as products. The past 30 years
have seen an explosion in MLMs and other businesses eager
to assimilate MLM elements for the same benefits. While
MLM may have once been a good method of reaching small out-of-the-way
markets, I am extremely leery of any company
that utilizes any form of it in order to move product today.
|
Below
are some websites about MLMs, some pro, some con. Some websites
are now defunct, whether the site operator simply lost interest
or was forced to close the website when legal defense costs became
too much. As with most any defunct website, you can use the Internet
Archive "Wayback Machine" at http://www.archive.org
to view historical captures.
- Direct
Selling Association (DSA). Pro-MLM. Members include
multi-level sellers such as Amway and Primerica; single level
direct sellers such as Mary Kay & Tupperware - which are curiously
no longer listed in DSA's
public directory (note historical capture as of Dec.
12, 2005) as being single-level. Note also that there
is now a "Public" DSA Member Directory available to
the general public, and a "Private" DSA Member Directory,
available only to DSA Members; the change occurred around Dec.
15, 2005.
- The
DSA supports HR 1220 (the deceptive "Anti-Pyramid Promotional
Scheme Act of 2003"); see their
page (archived) on it. Pyramid
Scheme Alert is AGAINST
HR 1220; see why.
- The
Consumer Awareness Institute has an interesting page called
"Legislators & Regulators: Beware
the DSA!" See why author Dr Jon Taylor believes
this.
- At
one time the DSA hijacked
(archived; click on a date to see the proof) the
mistyped web traffic of a critical site, www.pyramidschemealert.ORG,
by registering www.pyramidschemealert.COM
(& .info, .net, .biz, etc.). A screencap from July 2003
shows that pyramischemealert.com was first redirected to DSA's
page on "HR 1220"; as of May 18, 2004 it redirected
to DSA's
page on "pyramid schemes". The Quixtar
Sucks Blog posted a nice screencap of the DSA
registrant, Amy Robinson (compare to 2009
record), then-VP
of Communications and Media Relations at DSA. This disgraceful
behavior belies the spirit of DSA's own "code
of ethics", which states: "Member companies
shall ensure that no statements [...] are made which are
likely to mislead consumers"; and "Sellers
shall truthfully identify themselves".
- DSA
membership does
not come cheap, and many parts of DSA.org, particularly
those regarding government affairs and legislative activism,
are off-limits to non-members. I'm particularly curious what
is covered in DSA's
Top-Selling Product called "Coffee Break:
No One is Safe from the Legislature"! (Products
I WAS able to view average over $1500 for non-Members; you
can imagine how many non-Members ever buy these.) As for how
DSA penalizes members who violate their "Code
of Ethics", the most severe penalty they can inflict
is to terminate the member's DSA membership. You can guess
how often DSA terminates memberships. I did find one MLM,
Monavie, who may have been terminated from DSA (U.S.), but
that appears to have been the result of one Amway member who
was terminated by Amway and then took his downline with him
to Monavie. His "crime" is technically "encouraging
distributors to violate their Amway non-compete agreements".
Monavie is NOT currently listed on DSA's membership, but Monavie's
website, curiously enough, still includes a link not to
the Canadian DSA of which they are a member, but to the U.S.
DSA of which they are NOT a member!
- Dr.
Jon Taylor's "The
5 Red Flags of Product-Based Pyramid Schemes" points
out that the DSA has duped multiple states into signing
deceptive legislation similar to thus-far-unsuccessful
proposed federal HR 1220, which
would effectively legalize product-based pyramid schemes:
Texas, Montana, Louisiana,
Oklahoma, and New Mexico;
mlmlegal.com
adds Kentucky. DSA-sponsored
legislation was also passed into law in Idaho
in 2004 (SB 1237) South Dakota (HB 1183),
and Georgia (SB
141). Other states which have been duped into adopting
similar legislation include North Dakota,
Maryland, and Illinois (*).
According to PyramidSchemeAlert.com, Florida's
SB
2648 (died in committee in 2005) is "virtually identical
to a bill recently defeated in Utah"
[the defeated HB
269, which was later passed in the incarnation of
DSA-initiated SB
182 in 2005]. Dr Taylor blatantly says of MLM-swamped
Utah's DSA-driven SB 182: "The
DSA duped Utah's top law enforcement officials, legislators,
and Governor Huntsman into legalizing product-based pyramid
schemes." I'm sure other states have passed
such laws as well while critics weren't looking.
- In
2008 the DSA
lobbied the FTC to ensure exemption of multi-level business
opportunities from coverage by the FTC's
Initial Proposed Business Opportunity Rule (IPBOR), which
would require disclosures to the buyer encompassing things
like:
- Whether
or not sellers make earnings claims
- The
name of the person making the earnings claim and the date
of the earnings claim
-
The earnings claim
-
The beginning and ending dates when the represented earnings
were achieved
- The
number and percentage of all purchasers during the stated
time period who achieved at least the stated level of
earnings
- Any
characteristics of the purchasers who achieved at least
the represented level of earnings, such as their location,
that may differ materially from the characteristics of
the prospective purchasers being offered the business
opportunity
- A
statement that written substantiation for the earnings
claim will be made available to the prospective purchaser
upon request
-
A list of any criminal or civil legal actions against
the seller or its representatives that involve fraud,
misrepresentations, or deceptive or unfair trade practices
-
The terms of any cancellation or refund policies
-
The total number of purchasers in the past two years
-
The number of those purchasers seeking a refund or to
cancel in that time period
- Names
of people who can provide references
When
the FTC solicited comments on the Initial Proposed Business
Opportunity Rule, 95%
of the more than 17,000 comments received by the FTC came
from members of the MLM industry expressing opposition
to it. The DSWA
(Direct Selling Women's Alliance) stated these reasons as
their primary objections:
- The
required disclosure and earnings statements
and the required list of all distributors who have cancelled
their distributorship in the previous last two years may
cause the sponsoring process to become cumbersome and
difficult. (Ya think?!)
-
These requirements may create unnecessary alarm
and concern about the legitimacy of the profession
and your business opportunity to prospective distributors.
(Unnecessary?!)
- The
proposed seven day waiting period between receiving the
disclosures and enrollment would likely cause a
potential distributor to lose their enthusiasm for joining
your company. (God forbid a prospect actually
THINKS about the decision.)
-
The costs of complying with the requirements would
increase expenses to the company which may be passed
on through the selling price of goods or services we offer.
(You've GOT to be kidding.)
One
must wonder why the DSA and the MLM industry it represents
would oppose these requirements that are designed to help
the consumer avoid getting defrauded by them!
After all, the entire reason the Franchise
and Business Opportunity Rule exists is to define the
proper scope of the term ‘‘business opportunity,’’
the types of business opportunities that are known to
engage in deceptive or fraudulent conduct, and the types
of disclosures that are material to business opportunity
purchasers. The DSA's
flimsy defense is that fraud in the MLM industry is already
well covered by Section 5 of the FTC Act, but if that were
the case then the new Proposed Business Opportunity Rule isn't
necessary for anyone. In 2008 the DSA was apparently
successful,
as the FTC said: "The revised proposal [...] would
not reach multi-level marketing companies or certain
companies that may have been swept inadvertently into scope
of the April 2006 proposal." What a convenient omission!
-
The
DSA has a vested interest in helping ensure IRS laws continue
to (mis?) -classify direct sellers as "independent
contractors" in spite of the fact that
they do not fit in that category according to the
IRS's own guidelines. Why? Because it shifts the tax
burden onto the contractor, and because it helps the
company dodge legal liabilities by foisting them onto the
contractor. The MLM can simply feign ignorance of a
"rogue" distributor's "misconduct" when
a consumer brings a lawsuit or a regulatory agency brings
an action, even when they explicitly encouraged the
often-ignorant distributor to break the law! In particular,
note that you are more than likely an employee if the employer
can exercise control of your work through the threat of
dismissal. In 1982,
Congress adopted Internal Revenue
Code Section 3508 (IRC
§3508) to "provide a statutory
scheme for assuring the status of [...] direct
sellers [...] as independent contractors."
In 1994, the DSA argued with the Senate Committee on Finance
that "direct sellers established themselves as independent
contractors for tax purposes under the common law rules
in the test case of Aparacor, Inc. v. United States, 556
F.2d 1004 (Ct. CI. 1977)." (DSA again referenced Aparacor
in arguing their case in 2007 with the House
Committee on Ways and Means.) However, if you study
the actual Aparacor
case, the trial judge's opinion states that "the
word 'termination' is used in company procedures simply
to signify that a relationship with a particular distributor
has come to an end because of a lack of interest on
the part of the distributor" and that the distributorship
could be reactivated by simply ordering product. He also
stated Arapacor/Queen's-Way's "primary interest is
in maximum sales of its products, and it is not concerned
with the ways, means and methods [control]
employed to accomplish that result". The comparison
of Aparacor to today's MLMs is extremely shaky, as most
if not all MLMs can terminate your membership at will; one
case of many concerns former Amway distributor Eric Scheibeler,
who wrote a
book lamenting how Amway effectively terminated
the large business he'd built after he questioned
his upline's fantastic income claims. Jay Van Andel, co-founder
of Amway, said in 1982:
"They're NOT
our employees and we can't tell them or enforce things
beyond a certain degree". Note the year. Of course
that's rubbish. MLMs certainly DO control the "ways,
means, and methods" that distributors may use to run
"their own businesses" -- the distributor's "business"
does not even EXIST apart from its relationship with
the MLM! You can lose your entire business while the
MLM can simply reabsorb your downline and replace you. Last
of all, for all its support of misclassifying ICs, the DSA's
own "Code of Ethics" includes an intriguing bit
of double-speak entitled "Prompt Investigation and
No Independent Contractor Defense" which states:
"For
the purposes of this Code, in the interest of fostering
consumer protection, companies shall voluntarily
not raise the independent contractor status of salespersons
distributing their products or services under its trademark
or trade name as a defense against Code violation
allegations and such action shall not be construed
to be a waiver of the companies' right to raise such defense
under any other circumstance."
-
- What's
Wrong With Multi-Level Marketing? Anti-MLM. Note
the section on "market saturation."
- The
10 Big Lies of Multi-Level Marketing. Anti-MLM.
Attempts to debunk pro-MLM arguments.
- Lessons
From The Pyramids: Why Nearly Everyone Loses Money in MLM, but
So Many Keep Trying. Anti-MLM. Demonstrates the
saturation argument against MLMs.
- 10
Lessons for Consumers from the Equinox Case.
Anti-MLM. Equinox International was shut down by the FTC in
2001 as an illegal pyramid scheme. Topics covered include why
illegal MLMs (pyramid schemes) can appear so legitimate, and
why they're so hard to shut down.
- Quatloos.com:
Multi-Level Marketing (MLM). Anti-MLM. Includes
a brief history of MLM and why it can be argued to be obsolete.
- Truth
on MLM.
Anti-MLM. Very detailed site by Dr. Jon Taylor of the Consumer
Awareness Institute, featuring his 10+ years of research on
MLMs. Be sure to read the "5
Red Flags" of a Recruiting MLM or Product-Based Pyramid
Scheme and the
Evaluation
of 125 MLM Programs. Note that the latter report
posits that there are only two MLMs out of hundreds
that qualify as legitimate opportunities based on the "5
Red Flags". The Evaluation was updated with over 250
MLM programs.
- LawDawg's
Law Blog.
In 1996, after ten years of "pointing out the fallacies
and falsehoods of MLM and its hucksters", LawDawg moved
on to other pursuits and his blog went offline. This link is
to the archives. I found it necessary to click anywhere on text
and highlight all text (CTRL+A) to read much of it, but it's
all worthwhile reading. Note in particular his "Introduction
to Pyramid Scheme Math". He didn't find it necessary
to prove that within so many levels the MLM's participants would
exceed the population of the world. Instead, he simply noted
that after a very few number of levels, most pyramid schemes
characteristically maintained that the bottom level would always
be a certain percentage of participants (in his case a 1x6 matrix
after only 3 levels yielded 83.3% ad infinitum), and if
that bottom level cannot make retail sales to people OUTSIDE
the scheme because of market saturation, it will ALWAYS lose
money. MLM by its very structure contains no controls for market
saturation.
- The
MLM File. Anti-MLM. One Ex-MLMer's 35-year experience.
His motivation for creating the site: for "the hundreds
of people I have personally known who have 'failed' in MLM,
many of whom I directly caused to be recruited." Also includes
the author's answer to the question "Is
There Really 'Outstanding Growth Potential for MLM?";
you might guess his answer is "no, the rich just get richer".
- USA
Today: Don't Get Taken By Multi-Level Marketing.
Anti-MLM. Author advises: "Never, and I mean never, sign
up for a multilevel marketing (MLM) program"; lists why.
- Market
Saturation in MLM. Anti-MLM. Product saturation
versus business opportunity saturation -- what is really being
sold? Why recruit your own competition?
- The
Millenium Project's Section on MLMs.
Anti-MLM. Author Peter Bowditch's entertaining opinions on and
experiences with MLMs. Many comments on individual MLMs.
- The
Lies of MLM.
Pro-MLM, believe it or not. Warns MLMers against perpetuating
some lies that less scrupulous MLMers made up, such as "MLM
is the wave of the future" and "20 percent of all
millionaires in America were created through Network Marketing".
- MLM
vs Traditional Business. Pro-MLM. MLMer attempts
to dissect the differences.
- MLM
Legal.
Pro-MLM. MLM attorney Jeffery Babener, an active spokesman for
the MLM industry who assists the DSA in compliance issues and
who has counseled MLMs like Melaleuca and NuSkin, provides an
excellent site detailing many issues relevant to the industry
as well as a pretty detailed history of MLM regulation.
- Anti-MLM
Zealots: Do They Have A Point?
Pro-MLM. 10+ year MLMer Leonard Clements offers pro-MLM rebuttals
against some popular anti-MLM websites.
- MLM.com's
Directory of MLM Companies. Find out if the company
that contacted you is an MLM using this searchable alphabetical
directory.
- MLMWatchdog.
Pro-MLMer Rod Cook attacks pyramid schemes and abusive MLMs.
Fascinating site including many legal cases.
IIIb.
So What Exactly Separates
Legal MLMs from Illegal Ones?
(Under
construction; opinion article last updated May 2009)
That
question has been under scrutiny for at least 30 years.
What follows is a history of how MLM's legality was established,
and why the questions asked early on were on track - and
then conveniently forgotten.
Direct
sales, legitimate forerunner of MLM
In
the late 19th and early 20th century, direct sales consisted
of single-level direct marketing by companies such as
Avon (then known as California Perfume Company). Many
sold through catalogs, but catalogs did not reach every
market. Early direct marketers hired salespeople to travel
to small towns and rural areas not already covered by
advertising to introduce residents to their catalogs and
products. Commission overrides were just a way of rewarding
enterprising salespeople who pressed into these out-of-the-way
markets; the products virtually sold themselves for the
front-line salespeople. However, these were traditional
single-level sales businesses, not yet multi-level marketing
organizations (MLMs). I must emphasize that direct
sales only had a place in the marketing world of that
time because advertising was not yet able to reach every
potential consumer.
The
Ponzi Scheme: Forerunner of modern pyramid schemes
The
actual MLM model was preceded by a scam that could be
argued to have influenced its beginnings. It existed in
several forms prior, but Carlo "Charles" Ponzi's
name stuck to it. In 1919,
Ponzi started the scheme for which he became famous and
which would later be compared to MLMs: he paid off early
investors with money taken in by later investors by creating
a consumer stampede with hype of phenomenal returns within
a very short period of time (*).
Instead of marketing his product legitimately and honestly
to end consumers, he marketed to "warm market"
investors, which included his extended family members,
his Catholic priest, and some neighbors (*),
from whom he collected a total of about $1250.
Ninety days later, he returned $750 in "interest".
His ecstatic original investors unwittingly did his marketing
for him -- they told everyone they knew about this "bonanza,"
and investments snowballed.
The
party did not last. Within a year, a suspicious Boston
Post's front page questioned the legitimacy of the enterprise.
Investors panicked and demanded their money back. The
problem was that none of the "interest"
was real, as Ponzi was only returning to early investors
funds invested by later investors. When everyone
wanted their money back, it simply wasn't around to return!
Without the hype to induce new participants, Ponzi's scheme
folded. Most of his 40,000 investors lost everything they
had invested.
Some
posit that Ponzi's scheme was not technically a pyramid
scheme because he did not actually recruit others to perpetuate
the scheme, but they're wrong. The mechanism is the same
-- there must be early investors at the top of the pyramid
whose gains are funded by later investors at the bottom,
and some sort of exploitation to perpetuate sales which
has nothing to do with demand for the product. Some also
posit that a saturated market will inevitably cause a
pyramid scheme to collapse, but that is likewise untrue.
A pyramid scheme can actually reach market equilibrium,
continuing as long as new participants can be motivated.
There is indeed a sucker born every minute. But it is
true that once a critical number of participants
leave the scheme, motivation plummets and it will likely
collapse.
Later
enterprising scammers saw the potential in recruiting
endless downline "entrepreneur-chains" who would
simply duplicate the original fraud, whether knowingly
or unknowingly. These later scammers were even smarter,
actually -- when the law came breathing down their necks,
they could simply disavow knowledge of their downlines'
illegal activities. And with the money they made in their
schemes, they could buy influence to stay in "business".
At
least the Mafia knew you don't screw over your friends
and family.
Post-Ponzi:
MLM's infancy
Fast
forward to 1927,
when one of the earliest multi-level sales companies
(if not the first), a vitamin and supplements
company called Nutrilite, started (*)
as California Vitamin Corporation. Nutrilite's founder
discovered that selling vitamins was difficult because
they were largely unheard of at the time. He literally
couldn't give them away until he hit on the idea
of turning consumers into distributors, paying them commissions
for referrals (*).
Consumers, excited by earning extra money and perhaps
goaded on by claims that Nutrilite products were effective
in treating cancer, heart trouble, and other ailments,
bit. Gross sales soared to $500,000 a month, but in 1947
the FDA began a 4-year battle to halt these spurious claims
(*).
They were able to stop direct curative claims, but excited
consumers' testimonials remained in marketing materials,
continuing to indirectly perpetuate the myths. Thus began
early rudimentary multi-level direct sales and
its early battles with regulatory agencies.
In
1959, two
Nutrilite salesmen became frustrated with supply problems
and left (*,
*),
taking their Nutrilite downlines (*)
of over 2000 distributors (*)
with them. Rich DeVos and Jay Van Andel founded JaRi Corporation
and continued to refine the MLM business model. After
hitting some manufacturing snags with their own products,
they launched Amway in 1959
and utilized their ready-made and expanding sales force
such that sales jumped from $500,000 to $25 million between
1960 and
1964 (*)
-- by a factor of 50 within 4 years. This explosive
growth got attention, and critics believed that some of
the largest distributors were profiting at the expense
of new distributors (Ponzi, anyone?) by encouraging inventory
loading (or front-loading), the purchase of more goods
than distributors could sell (*).
Regulatory agencies took notice but had difficulty formulating
criteria that would differentiate legitimate MLMs from
illegal pyramid schemes. Perhaps the difference was more
subtle than they thought.
1975's
Koscot case: The FTC defines pyramid schemes
In
1972, the
Federal Trade Commission began investigating a cosmetics
MLM called Koscot Interplanetary (I guess
they had distributors on Mars), which was founded only
5 years earlier and already making $56 million a year,
for being a pyramid scheme (*).
The Securities and Exchange Commission joined soon thereafter,
alleging securities violations. The FTC defined a pyramid
as:
"characterized
by the payment by participants of money to the company
in return for which they receive (1) the right to sell
a product and (2) the right to receive in return for
recruiting other participants into the program rewards
which are unrelated to sale of the product to ultimate
users" (*).
This
became known as the Koscot test. In the 1975,
the case concluded; the FTC determined that
not only did Koscot run a pyramid
scheme in which Koscot motivated more distributorship
sales than product sales (recruiting over retailing),
but it implied that all MLMs that represent an
equal opportunity for success must be inherently fraudulent
due to inevitable market saturation (*):
"[...]
even where rewards are based upon sales to consumers,
a scheme which represents indiscriminately to
all comers that they can recoup their investments by
virtue of the product sales of their recruits must end
up disappointing those at the bottom who can find no
recruits capable of making retail sales."
(FTC v. Koscot Interplanetary 86 F.T.C. 1106, 1975)
(*)
Note
also that the FTC in its Statement of Facts did not yet
make any clear distinction between "multileveling"
and pyramid selling:
"Koscot's
distribution method has come to be known as multileveling
or pyramid selling. Such a system has been
condemned as unlawful by the Commission, as well as
by numerous courts." (FTC
v. Koscot Interplanetary 86 F.T.C. 1106, 1975) (*),
A
major ruling (not opinion!) the FTC was referring to was
issued only a year before in 1974 when it found in multilevel
marketing's very structure an "intolerable
potential to deceive" (*).
Curiously,
the FTC would later back off from this condemnation of
MLM itself. Also contributing to Koscot's condemnation
was the fact that founder Glenn Turner ran a side business,
"Dare To Be Great," selling "motivational
materials" (books, tapes, records, seminars) to its
distributors which had little value to anyone outside
the company and could not be considered "retail"
sales to "ultimate users". The SEC noted in
its 1974 investigation that the Koscot manual instructed
distributors to recruit using Opportunity Meetings, which
were part of the "motivational materials" business,
to drive recruitment:
"Never
explain the program to a prospect before bringing him
to an Opportunity Meeting. Do not mention Kosmetics
or give any particulars, as many people will prejudge
the program and decide it is not for them before they
see the presentation. [...] When you invite a prospect
to an Opportunity Meeting, arouse his curiosity. Tell
him you have discovered a wonderful financial opportunity
that will fit him like a glove. Or, tell him you have
seen a money tree and would like for him to
take a look at it." (SEC v Koscot, 1974 [*])
The
FTC determined that Koscot's motivational materials side
business was its main business, rewarding recruitment
more than retailing of products to the financial detriment
of its work force -- "money borrowed, jobs quit,
homes mortgaged, and even personal bankruptcy" (*).
It established that recruiting over retailing was the
hallmark of a pyramid scheme.
The
SEC found that Koscot's "profit-sharing arrangement"
with distributors constituted an unregistered security,
based on the "Howey Test" of 1946 (*):
"An
investment contract for purposes of the Securities Act
means a contract, transaction or scheme whereby a
person invests his money in a common enterprise and
is led to expect profits solely from the efforts of
the promoter or a third party [...]" (SEC
v. W.J. Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293, 1946)
The
reason Koscot's plan constituted a security was that a
distributor could "buy in" to a higher-level
distributorship instead of building his own from the ground
up, thus buying an enterprise that was designed to rely
on the efforts of others.
Litigation
ultimately forced Koscot out of business (*).
It
should be noted that by the early 1970s, direct
marketing and MLM were effectively obsolete, utilized
by companies only for their low expenses (no
advertising, salaries, pensions, health insurance, etc.)
and lack of regulation (because they
hired distributors as independent contractors,
they were not subject to regulation under the 1938 Fair
Labor Standards Act [minimum wage, overtime, unemployment],
the 1970 Occupational Safety and Health Act, and the 1974
Employee Retirement Income Security Act [*],
and tax withholding and reporting). Advertising was reaching
almost everyone by then, so there was no longer any need
for door-to-door salesmen to penetrate out-of-the-way
markets. Before the Social Security Act of 1935, company
benefits and pensions were few and far between and companies
were still recovering from the Great Depression, so there
had been greater incentive for those seeking employment
to enter into a full-commission sales position that offered
residual sales commissions and thus a potential retirement
income. The arrangement had at one time suited both company
and distributor, but now the only way to lure
potential distributors away from more secure jobs with
benefits was to emphasize the income angle and "independence"
offered by the MLM "business opportunity".
Now competing with brick-and-mortar businesses, MLMs began
slurring those businesses as slave drivers who built their
empires at the "expense" of their employees'
efforts and, with an ironic twisting of poor logic, even
compared them to pyramids in which the many at the bottom
enriched the few at the top!
The
1970s saw such a proliferation of pyramid schemes that
then-Senator Walter Mondale (D-MN 1964-76) sponsored a
federal anti-pyramiding bill, which passed the United
States Senate twice in the 1970s but never became law
(*).
One has to wonder what was so difficult about getting
it passed when the Koscot case supposedly laid out the
ground rules. The
Washington Post hinted at one 1970s change that seemed
to entrench MLM in spite of its tangles with regulatory
authorities:
"[Amway's]
founders' proximity to power -- their former congressman,
Gerald R. Ford, became president [(R) 1974-1977] --
assured them political consideration as problems arose
with government regulators" (*).
And
so we return to the Mother Of All MLMs, Amway.
1979's
Amway case: A critical one that got away?
In
1975, the
FTC began its investigation of Amway, alleging that it
was an illegal pyramid scheme that misrepresented its
income opportunity and improperly fixed prices. Complaint
counsel pointed out:
"[...]
that the Amway Sales and Marketing Plan is inherently
unlawful because it is 'a scheme to pyramid
distributors upon ever increasing numbers of other distributors.'
They argue that the Amway Plan, even without
actual proof of economic failure, is 'doomed to
failure' and contains an 'intolerable
potential to deceive.' The
complaint alleges that distributors are not long likely
to recruit other distributors because 'recruitment
of additional participants must of necessity ultimately
collapse when the number of personal theretofore recruited
has so saturated the area with distributors or dealers
as to render it virtually impossible to recruit others.'"(FTC
v. Amway, 1979) (*)
The
FTC's 1979
Final Order on Amway found it to be engaging two counts
of price-fixing and one count of misrepresentation of
the business opportunity (*),
but unlike Koscot, Amway was determined not
to be a pyramid scheme because it had rules in
place that discouraged inventory loading, the practice
of encouraging a distributor to buy more products than
could be sold due to the market saturation potential inherent
in MLM:
- a
representative must make at least 10 sales calls a
month in order to be eligible for commissions (the
10 customer rule)
- a
representative must sell 70 percent of previously
ordered inventory before placing a new order (the
70 percent rule)
- the
company would buy back unsold inventory at 90 percent
of cost (the 90% buyback rule)
These
rules became known as the "Amway Safeguards".
The
Commission acknowledged the complaint counsel's argument
that the 'intolerable potential to deceive' could be inherent
in MLM due to its very structure but noted the argument
was not yet accepted by the courts, implying it would
not set precedent. It chose to work only with actual harm
to consumers, not potential harm, and appeared to reason
that if the market ever did saturate, distributors
might waste time and effort building businesses that could
never succeed but at least they couldn't lose more than
10% of their investment and be stuck with a garage full
of unsalable inventory. (I guess a person's time and effort
should cost them money instead of earning it.) The Commission's
Opinion was critical to the MLM industry; MLM
would not likely exist today if Amway had not prevailed
(*).
However,
complaint counsel missed some reasoning using
their own statistics that could have proven Amway indeed
fit the FTC's description of a pyramid scheme.
Here's the FTC's definition again:
A
pyramid scheme is "characterized by the payment
by participants of money to the company in return for
which they receive (1) the right to sell a product and
(2) the right to receive in return for recruiting other
participants into the program rewards which are unrelated
to sale of the product to ultimate users"
(*).
Now
some statistics from the FTC v. Amway case:
"The
number of active distributors since 1972 has
remained relatively
constant, fluctuating around 300,000,
climbing in 1977 to about 360,000."
There
was either a multi-year recruiting slump or Amway
had saturated its market by 1972.
Defense counsel pointed out that some distributors were
able to recruit in the same markets where other distributors
"failed"; thus, saturation could not have occurred
yet. The Commission even deferred to a "marketing
expert" called on by the defense who said that distributors
who complained that they could not recruit were probably
"not making the sale effort that is required"!
Let's look at why recruiting would have stagnated.
The
average annual turnover of Amway distributors is
about 50%. The turnover rate for Amway distributors
during their first year is almost 75% and thereafter
about 25% a year.
If
Amway's turnover was averaging 50% every year, then it
was essentially replacing every recruit who dropped out.
But if you extrapolate the latter figures (and complaint
counsel did not), you see that 99.5%
of Amway's original work force turned over in
just 15 years (*)
(in year one, 75 out of 100 quit [75%]; in year two, 25%
of the remaining 25 quit, leaving 19 [81%]; year three,
25% of remaining 19 quit, leaving 14 [85%]; etc.). Indeed,
Amway started in 1959, and only approximately 15 years
later appeared to have reached saturation equilibrium.
Why would such a high percentage of the original work
force leave when at a bare minimum they could remain distributors
and receive Amway's many everyday products at wholesale
instead of retail? The products clearly weren't
the motivating factor behind the vast majority of distributors'
joining and remaining in Amway then. In fact,
while many of an MLM's products may be legitimate and
even of excellent quality, distributors typically discontinue
purchasing them when they quit their MLM (*).
But
they were doing better than the minimum; according to
Amway, a stagnant number of distributors were making more
sales than ever:
"[...]
the sales trend for Amway has shown almost uninterrupted
growth." (*)
The
average monthly BV [business volume] of Amway
distributors in fiscal 1969-70 was about $20 a month.
Much of this amount is consumed by the distributors
themselves rather than resold. [...] Many
of them consume large amounts of the products every
month. [...] We note that this figure
is not 'retail sales', but Business Volume -- that is,
the retail value of the products purchased for resale
to consumers and sponsored distributors, and for distributor
home consumption which, as stated before,
constitutes a large portion of all sales
of Amway products. [...]
Most
distributors average 30% of Business
Volume as income.
So
according to Amway, the average distributor made about...
well, $20 x .30 = $6 a month, or $72/year before expenses.
Not that bad, if you note that $6 in 1969 was about $35
in 2008 (*).
But wait, that's just an average (and it is gross,
not net!). Remember, each time a distributor
at the huge bottom of the pyramid sold something, even
just to himself, his upline going up to the tiny top made
money. As with the turnover example, let's
see how profits in Amway were leveraged.
In
attempting to recruit new distributors, respondents
made generalized earnings claims like, 'You can
earn $12,000 a year. . . .' [...] The Commission
opinion noted that of the 12,000 distributors selling
for respondents in 1969, not more than
sixty, or one-half of
1 percent of the total number
of distributors, made profits in excess of $10,000.
A
separate source estimates Amway's 1969 sales at $85
million (*).
[In 2008 dollars that translates to $498,419,618.53
(*).]
Yikes.
If 12,000 distributors made only $72 a year, then Amway
would have made only $2,880,000 ($72
X 12,000 = $864,000 / .30), but it made $85,000,000.
The rest of that $82,120,000 ($85,000,000 - $2,880,000)
went somewhere, and it wasn't to the average
distributor! If distributor #60 out of 12,000 was only
netting $10K/year and #600 was netting $72, you can imagine
what the guy up top was netting. Since
the vast bottom-tier distributors were only self-consuming,they
were only losing money. And that's right, 99.5%
(remember that percentage?) never earned the $12K/year
that Amway represented they all had an equal opportunity
of making:
Amway
literature urges recruiters not to 'quote dollar incomes
on specific individuals even though you may want
to use their stories about the homes in which they live,
the cars they drive, or the airplanes they fly.'
Amway officers and other representatives have,
however, orally stated specific dollar
incomes which are attributed to Amway distributors.
These statements are typically made in mass sales
rallies which are primarily for persons who are
already Amway distributors. The context of the sales
talk is inspirational and it is to a knowledgeable
crowd already aware of the details of the Amway
Sales and Marketing Plan, and in this motivational context
the statements are obviously meant and understood to
be feasible goals and not guaranteed average
income for the listeners.
Knowledgeable
crowd? So did Amway make these people aware that 99.5%
of them would fail, apparently as just "horrible
salespeople"? The market of "knowledgable"
people attracted to such a plan would saturate very
quickly. Using just the statistics above, one could come
to the conclusion that Amway was roping in a self-consuming
revolving market for its own products using deception,
enriching only a few at the top off the backs of the masses.
And
that was apparently exactly what was happening. Remember
how Koscot's founder had been operating a side business
overselling "motivational tools"
(books, records, tapes, seminars) to distributors in order
to encourage and retain their participation, tools that
had little to no value outside the scheme? Some high-level
Amway distributors had apparently figured out the key
to driving up their sales Koscot pyramid-style. According
to Amway/Quixtar Managing Director Ken McDonald in a 2000
conversation with former high-level distributor Bo Short,
Amway knew about these illegal tools businesses
as early as 1965 (*).
They were a problem for Amway-- the books, records, and
rallies sold by these "rogue" high-level distributors
competed for distributors' money that should have been
going to Amway products. The rogues may have had that
covered too -- today they tell their downline distributors
to "buy from yourself" to "build your business"
-- just find friends and family willing to do the same
and everybody will get rich. They put pressure on distributors
to buy motivational tapes and attend frequent seminars
(not free) or risk losing their "business momentum".
They encourage distributors to spend on credit in an effort
to appear wealthy before they actually are, to the point
of bankruptcy, foreclosure, and divorce, while at seminars
they promote the business as having made them wealthy
and saved their marriages. And they encourage hyperconsumption
to the point that their trusting downlines fill their
basements and garages with products just to make the next
level of commissions and prestige -- precisely the front-loading
problem that the FTC tried to address in the 1979 case.
Many websites today detail this abuse, and I have little
doubt this was already part of those rogues' strategy
during the 60s and 70s when Amway came under FTC scrutiny
for being a pyramid scheme. But they had to benefit Amway
or risk having their distributorships terminated. For
Amway, the payoff from the tools businesses may have been
(and likely still is) huge. Recall that between 1960 and
1964 Amway sales had jumped from $500,000 to $25 million
(*),
reaching $200 million by 1976 (*),
$1.2 billion by 1981, and more than $4 billion by 2003
(*).
That's growth by a factor of over 8000 in only
43 years.
Amway
definitely hit some snags along the way. A 1985 Forbes
magazine article ("Cleaning Up", March 25, 1985)
describes Amway's business slumping after 1981 and implies
that defectors were leaving because they were
either losing their shirts after being milked by the tools
businesses or angry that Amway was failing to terminate
the abusers (*).
Only 3 years after Amway emerged victorious against the
FTC, co-founder Rich DeVos chastised his organization:
"You
[the Direct Distributors] present the wonderful numbers
on the blackboard about all the money they [distributors]
can make. Maybe you ought to tell them about all you're
going to take from them [with your tool businesses]
before they make any" ("Directly Speaking"
tapes, 1982 [*]).
But
one year later in 1983, Amway solved the illegal
tools businesses problem not by terminating the distributorships
of offenders but by absorbing their tools
businesses into its own business, paying limited commissions
on their sales (*).
One website author posits rather convincingly that
real estate "guru" Robert Kiyosaki's motivational
book Rich Dad, Poor Dad made him a millionaire
only after Amway adopted it into its tools program (*).
Also in 1983, the television program 60 Minutes ("Soap
and Hope"[*])
noted the connection between the riches earned by Amway's
largest distributors and the illegal tools businesses.
Interviewee Bruce Craig, Wisconsin's Attorney General,
revealed that of 20,000 Amway distributors in
Wisconsin, the average income of 99+% of Wisconsin Amway
distributors was actually a net loss,
and the program implied the illegal tools businesses were
milking participants. (An examination of the 1979-1980
tax records in the state of Wisconsin showed that the
Direct Distributors, comprising less than 1% of all distributors,
reported a net loss of $918 on average [*]
[*],[*].)
Amway co-founder Jay Van Andel's response: "They're
NOT our employees and we can't tell them or enforce things
beyond a certain degree"(*).
Only
three years after that, one of Amway's largest distributors,
Dexter Yager, admitted to Forbes magazine ("Cleaning
Up", March 25, 1985) that the tools sales
in his "leg" comprised 2/3 of his income (*)
-- and his leg accounted for perhaps 1/3 of Amway's
direct sales volume. Former high-level Amway
distributor turned whistle-blower Eric Scheibeler, author
of the exposé book Merchants of Deception,
describes the tools business as still being in full swing
in the 1990s even after many, many complaints (*).
When he complained to Amway corporate, Amway shut off
his income and told him to discontinue contact with distributors
he was revealing the fraud to (*).
In 2002, Amway terminated the distributorships of 6 large
distributors who loudly complained about not receiving
their fair share of the tools business from their uplines;
12 others resigned, protesting that Amway should have
canned the abusers, not those who simply complained about
the abuse (*).
In 2004, Dateline NBC did an exposé on Amway/Quixtar
(Amway began calling itself Quixtar in North America in
1999 [*])
in which a high-level distributor was unwittingly caught
on tape admitting that 3/4 of his income came
from the motivational tool business (*).
Rogue high-level distributors also encouraged disregard
for the 10-customer rule; in 1998 Louisiana
newspaper The Advocate quotes Larry Harper, a senior
manager of Amway’s distributor relations section,
acknowledging that bonus checks get paid to distributors
who have no retail sales and that it was up to
the Direct Distributor to decide if this rule should be
enforced (*).
In spite of any defections, Amway's sales still grew fantastically.
Returning
to 1979, the FTC had ruled an entire industry legal based
on the premise that MLM could avoid front-loading its
distributors with items they could not sell. This did
nothing to prevent the false advertising of the business
opportunity that drove participation without regard for
the sale of products, evidenced by the statistics I quoted
and plain old common sense. I once again repeat the FTC's
description of a pyramid scheme from Koscot:
A
pyramid scheme is "characterized by the payment
by participants of money to the company in return for
which they receive (1) the right to sell a product and
(2) the right to receive in return for recruiting other
participants into the program rewards which are unrelated
to sale of the product to ultimate users"
(*).
Amway
co-founder Jay Van Andel had admitted in 1982 that he
had little power over distributors who made false claims,
but in that same year legislation was conveniently passed
that got Amway -- and the MLM industry -- off the hook
for it anyway, as you'll see in the next section.
1982's
IRC §3508: Lobbyists push bad legislation to reclassify
specific employees as independent contractors for their
own benefit
In
the late 1970s, MLMs and other companies had witnessed
a pattern of the Internal Revenue Service fining into
bankruptcy companies which had misclassified employees
as independent contractors (ICs), a misclassification
which was costing the IRS revenue. Congress temporarily
halted the IRS's inquisition and attempted to clarify
worker classifications with its 1978
Tax Act Section 530 (IRC section 3401) safe harbors provisions
(*,
*),
but MLMs were still in a state of panic. Ruling their
independent contractors as employees would destroy the
very basis of MLM, that of individual business opportunities.
In
1982,
the IRS added Internal Revenue Code Section 3508,
which conveniently gave a statutory exemption to two groups
of workers: real estate agents and direct sellers.
§3508 in effect only muddled the difference
between independent contractors and employees, and I have
no doubt lobbying by the MLM and real estate industries
had everything to do with it. This was certainly
the case in 1996 when the newspaper lobby
got Senator Bob Dole (R-KS), who happened
to be running for president, to put a rider on the minimum
wage bill that excluded newspaper carriers from all of
the labor laws, making them permanent independent contractors
(*,
*).
Democratic President Bill Clinton signed
it into law that same year (*).
The biggest problem with §3508's exemptions
is that it directly conflicts with the IRS's criteria
for being an independent contractor. The one-sided
non-compete and non-solicitation
agreements that independent contractors in the
afore-mentioned industries are forced to sign (they have
no authority to negotiate what they're agreeing to) are
clearly against the laws of free enterprise that a true
independent contractor enjoys. Legitimate ICs,
by the IRS's and other regulatory agencies' own criteria,
come to their clients pre-hatched -- they already present
themselves as professionals in their fields; are usually
incorporated; have business and professional licenses;
assume responsibility for taxes, workers' comp, insurance
(E&O, health, dental, vision, etc.), expenses (advertising,
overhead), and legal liability (bonded); are hired on
a per-project basis and are paid upon completion of the
project; can realize a profit or suffer a loss in their
business; may perform services for as many clients as
they wish with no restrictions; come with all tools necessary
to complete jobs; and do not perform work for
clients which can impact the success or continuation of
the clients' businesses.
That
last point is crucial. MLM's success or continuation
depends on the services these workers provide; remove
these workers, and the business must grind to a halt!
And it works in reverse too -- take away the company,
and these workers' "businesses" vanish. The
last point is also significant in that MLM law
directly conflicts with it, actually requiring
the MLM to rely on the generation of sales and enrollments
exclusively by distributors and not by company
"employees" (*).
(This is to satisfy the "Howey Test" of 1946,
mentioned in the "Koscot" section of this article,
which determined that a regulable security existed when
"a person invests his money in a common
enterprise and is led to expect profits solely from the
efforts of the promoter or a third party" [*].)
The
impact of IRC §3508 on affected industries
can be seen in complaints about those industries which
have chosen to take advantage of §3508's
exemptions:
- Newspaper
carriers (*).
Newspapers have a long history of paying "paper
boys" to deliver papers. However, with today's
laws against child labor, they have been forced to
deal with a more demanding workforce pool. Some hire
actual employees, but many newspapers have
decided to take advantage of §3508's exemptions
and classify newspaper carriers as independent contractors.
They either allow the carrier to buy and resell the
newspapers at a set price or pay a commission per
paper delivered. Carriers at these newspapers bear
all expenses, including wear, tear, and insurance
on their own automobile; reporting taxes; health insurance;
etc. Although the advertised high wage looks
pretty good to new carriers, they find that when all
expenses are deducted from the "business",
they are working barely above minimum wage -- or even
at a loss! Many newspapers charge
the carrier a "complaint fine" several times
the retail cost of the paper when a customer complains
about a wet, torn, misplaced, late or missed paper.
This is particularly problematic when the newspaper
requires the carrier to bear the costs of bags and
rubber bands for the papers (without rubber bands,
the papers are difficult to throw), and paper theft
is commonplace in apartment complexes. Carriers complain
of being pressured to ignore traffic laws in order
to get deliveries done on time, since their route
is assigned by the newspaper. They burn through automobile
brakes, gasoline and headlights, and face robbery
and carjacking in the wee hours of the morning. When
they are injured slipping on icy driveways or bitten
by dogs, they are told it's their own problem (*).
As ICs, they face obstacles unionizing for better
working conditions (*).
- Real
estate agents. Some real estate businesses
stick to the now-safe method of hiring agents as "independent
contractors" and advertise to attract as many
new agents as possible in an agent-mill
fashion, arguably in order to gain access to the agent's
leads, which often consist
of friends and family. These new agents,
making a lesser percentage of commissions than
an experienced agent, make a few sales and often
end up leaving the business for lack of income; the
annual turnover rate for agents is high. Agents complain
about operating their own "businesses" and
having to pay for advertising, desk fees, insurance,
taxes, etc., yet their brokerage exercises control
over things more typical of an employer-employee relationship,
like adding the brokerage to their auto insurance
policies as second insureds or requiring the agent
to increase their coverage. These brokers often advertise
to attract far more new agents than the market
will bear (*),
allowing new agents, who require fewer hours of training
than even a hairdresser (*),
to sink or swim. Escalating consumer complaints against
California RE agents coincide with a 44 percent increase
in the number of agents between 1999 and 2004 (*).
Some comments from real estate agents regarding the
above model:
- "The
reason brokerages use new agents like puppy
mills is they know most people getting into
real estate are not coming from a business background
but from a 40 hour 9-to-5 collect-a-paycheck crowd.
[...] The owner/broker knows that everyone knows
someone in their sphere that will net them
a couple of deals before they die out with no
more leads." (*)
- "With
the huge 95%+ fall out rate of new agents in the
first 2 years that is how brokerages bring in
commissions from the built in sales most
agents have..." (*).
- "We
joke about part timers as 'they have a real job'
on the side" (*).
- "Most
of the new agents that are flooding the market
now are in search of a quick buck and think
they will be a millionaire in a year. Statistically,
each 'temp agent' will do less than a few deals
in a year. Then they go back to corporate America"
(*).
- "The
state considers us employees. We are only independent
contractors under IRS's eyes" (*).
The writer refers to the California Labor and
Workforce Development Agency, which has taken
the position that a RE agent is nearly always
an employee for workers' compensation insurance
purposes - but that is only California.
- Agents
carrying all expenses and generating all leads
wonder why they have to split commissions and
pay a broker for desk space at all! Fault lies
in the law, which requires RE agents to be sponsored
by a broker who may abuse his role.
- Direct
sellers. Complaints similar to both classes
above. This is a vague class, as it's the employer's
choice whether or not to classify the worker as a
direct seller. This last class is pertinent to MLMs
and is particularly wrong-headed in that ICs may only
write off their many expenses if they show a profit
for 3 out of 5 years according to the IRS (*);
the vast majority of MLM participants never net a
cent and thus do not qualify for writing off "business"
expenses. Direct sellers include mostly single-level
and multi-level (MLM) direct sellers, travel
agencies, and insurance and financial
services companies. The infiltration of MLM
and its elements into the insurance industry is even
more challenging, since the FTC does not oversee that
industry (*).
The
above industries, including MLM, were given specific
exemptions with the passage of IRC §3508 and its
amendments. However, there isn't a whole lot
stopping lobbyists from adding other industries to that
list, particularly ones where the misclassification
of independent contractors is already rampant.
Keep
in mind that IRC §530 was intended to provide companies
temporary relief against the IRS's 1970s crusade
against employee misclassification, which was robbing
it of revenue. In 1988, the IRS resumed its crusade
(*).
Industries wishing to continue misclassifying their
employees as independent contractors must push to get
their industries added to IRC §5308 or remain in
a race against the IRS's fining them into bankruptcy.
These industries tend to prey not on successful salespeople
but on relatively naive work forces that they must train,
consisting of the un- or undereducated, recent college
graduates, stay-at-home moms, immigrants, and disenfranchised
workers. (According to the Direct Selling Association,
the average direct seller is a married woman between
35-44 with at least some college education [*].)
Messengers
and couriers, delivery drivers, taxi drivers, auto rental
agents, car salespeople, model and talent scouts, and
others not currently included within IRC §3508
could all face possible reclassification if
lobbying is successful, or could be counted among the
vague "direct sellers" category if courts
set such precedent.
So
why do MLMs and other like employers misclassify workers
as independent contractors when those workers should quite
clearly be classified as employees of the company? Because
it's cheap and lessens legal liabilities. Companies that
hire independent contractors generally avoid employer
obligations under many state and federal laws (*).
For example:
-
Reasonable accommodation and return to work obligations
under disability laws do not apply.
- Anti-discrimination
obligations to protected employee classes (e.g., age,
race, sex, national origin, ancestry, disability,
medical condition, sexual preference, religion, etc.)
are not a concern (though independent contractors
are protected under sexual harassment laws).
- No
collective bargaining or union issues.
- No
employee benefits to extend, such as medical insurance,
pension, stock option and other equity plans.
- No
disability insurance, life insurance, sick pay and
vacation pay.
- The
worker is not part of the work force for workers'
compensation insurance purposes.
- Leaves
of absence, such as Family and Medical Leave Act and
pregnancy disability leave, are not required.
- Tax
and trust fund obligations (e.g., income tax, unemployment
insurance, state disability insurance, paid family
leave, employment training tax, Social Security and
Medicare) are of little concern.
- Unemployment
insurance benefits are not owed.
- Wage
and hour laws (e.g., minimum wage, overtime, rest
periods, vacation pay on termination, etc.) do not
apply.
-
Plant closure and mass layoff notice laws are not
a worry.
- Wrongful
employment termination and related causes of action
do not exist.
- Advertising
and prospecting, transportation, professional licensing,
office expenses, insurance, and legal expenses are
borne not by the company but by the independent contractor.
In
short, IC's are a cheap labor force, paid only when they
make a "sale" and without normal employee overhead.
And
finally, there was one more positively critical reason
that the MLM industry wanted to ensure that its ICs remained
so: legal liability. With 1982's IRC §5308, MLM could
safely shield itself from liabilities incurred by abusive
yet lucrative distributors, like those who operated the
"tools businesses" in Amway. Again I quote:
"They're
NOT our employees and we can't tell them or enforce
things beyond a certain degree" (Jay
Van Andel, co-founder of Amway, 1982 [*]).
Note
the year.
MLMs
proliferate in the 80s & 90s
With
the 1979
FTC v. Amway case "clarifying" the rules
under which the FTC would tolerate MLMs, and with the
1982 IRC §3508 "clarifying" direct sellers'
classifications as independent contractors, the 1980s
and 1990s
saw a proliferation of MLMs (to the left is a partial
list) and other industries (as mentioned above) that adopted
MLM-like compensation structures to reap the same benefits.
DSA memberships shifted from single-level to multi-level
quite significantly after 1982, so it must pay [guess
who?] for "direct sellers" to go MLM:
- In
1970, less than 5%
of DSA members were multi-level (as opposed to tradtional
single-level); the Direct Sellers Association got
its name only two years before in 1968. See the DSA's
history here.
- In
1990, 25%
of DSA members were multi-level;
- By
1996, over
70% of DSA members were multi-level;
- By
1999, 77.3%
of DSA members were multi-level;
- By
2000, 78%
of DSA members were multi-level;
- By
2009, 97%
of DSA members classified themselves as multi-level.
I arrived at this figure by searching "single-level"
[6] vs "multi-level" [197] in DSA's
public member directory, then just divide
6 by 197 for the percentage = 3% single. Also, some
of the 6 "single-level direct sellers" likewise
appear to be misclassified,
as their compensation structure fits the multi-level
model despite what they list, so the percentage may
be even higher. For instance, Avon
and Mary Kay's compensation plans were once listed
as single-level, and now the compensation plan is
blank.
What
enabled MLM's 80s/90s proliferation? More favors, of course,
and a relatively quiet FTC. Indeed, during the Republican-led
mid-1980s, the FTC actually sent representatives to MLM
industry meetings and even extolled the virtues of MLM
(*).
- The
single largest soft money donation then on record
to any political party was $2.5 million from the Amway
Corporation to the Republican Party in the final weeks
of the 1994
election (*),
(*).
A 1996 letter from Republican
National Committee Chairman Haley Barbour to Amway
co-founders DeVos and Van Andel read: "Your
generosity in 1994 clearly was a major factor in the
historic Republican capture of majorities in the House
and Senate".
- According
to the consumer watchdog group Common Cause, Amway
and affiliated donors made soft money contributions
to the Republican National Committee totaling $4,147,000
between January 1, 1991
and June 30, 1997
(*).
From 1994
to 1996
Amway gave $366,000 to Republican Party causes and
candidates, and it employed Roger Mentz, who was the
Assistant Treasury Secretary for Tax policy in the
Reagan Administration, as its tax lobbyist" (*).
Amway had tried to get a $283 million loophole for
itself passed in 1996
as an amendment to the minimum wage bill, but Sen.
Byron Dorgan (D-ND) shot it down (*);
then House Speaker and Amway supporter Newt
Gingrich (R-GA) sneaked it back into a bill
at the last moment in 1997
(*).
The payoff was ultimately seventyfold.
- A
1997
Texas newspaper article entitled "Congress Distributes
a Tax Break to Amway" pointed out that five Republican
House members at the time were Amway distributors
(Sue Myrick [R-NC], Jon Christensen
[R-NE], Dick Chrysler [R-MI], Richard
Rombo [R-CA], and John Ensign
[R-NE]). It further stated that "their informal
caucus meets several times a year with Amway bigwigs
to discuss policy matters affecting the company. [...]
House Majority Whip [and later indicted House Majority
Leader] Tom Delay (R-TX), a onetime
Amway salesman, also remains close to the company."
Myrick was a co-sponsor of DSA-backed HR 1220, which
would effectively legalize pyramid schemes if passed.
-
A 1998 Mother Jones
magazine article reported that Sue Myrick
owes her election to Amway -- almost half her total
campaign funds came from Amway people, urged on by
the voice of George Bush himself and distributed via
distributor Dexter Yager's internal
voicemail (Amvox) campaign (*),
(*),
(*),
(*);
this may have violated campaign laws. Myrick wasted
no time once in office in 1996
co-sponsoring the home-office deductibility bill,
which allows tax write-offs for independent contractors
who use their homes as offices -- a purported boon
for Amway distributors. The day before Amway's $1.3
million funding of GOP convention coverage was revealed,
Senator Bob Dole, who paid tribute to Amway founder
Richard DeVos at a Republican party fundraiser only
1 week before, announced his support for the home-office
deduction, as well as for an increase in health insurance
deductions for the self-employed -- another measure
purportedly benefiting Amway distributors. The same
Mother Jones article also states that Reps. Bill
Redmond (R-NM) and Heather Wilson
(R-NM) also received Amway funding in 1996.
- In
2000,
Amway was the second largest contributor of “soft
money” to the Republican National Party with
contributions totaling $1,138,500; Amway was second
in donations only to Reynolds Tobacco. The Orlando
Sentinel reported that Amway co-founder Richard DeVos
said: "People ask me sometimes why I support
Bush. I've been a friend to the family for a long
time. I give the max. People talk about buying access,
but all I can tell you is that politicians know
the people who support them" (*).
- In
2004,
the Republican 527 committee "Progress for America"
received money from Amway founders Richard DeVos and
Jay Van Andel, who each chipped in $2 million"
(Newsweek, "The Secret Money War," September
20, 2004 [*]).
In the last three weeks leading up to the November
2, 2004, election, Progress for America Voter Fund
(PFA-VF) outspent the next largest spending Democratic
527 group three-to-one on political ads, buying $16.8
million in television and radio ad time (*).
- In
May 2005,
former Amway President Dick DeVos,
son of co-founder Richard DeVos and one of the wealthiest
people in Michigan, and his wife Betsy DeVos,
former chairman of the Michigan GOP, were listed as
two of the largest campaign contributors of the 2004
election. Just days later, Dick announced that he
would run against Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm
in 2006 (*);
he lost.
- The
MLM-political entanglements get even uglier, touching
the Federal Trade Commission itself. As president,
George W. Bush appointed Timothy
Muris (2001-2004)
to head the FTC. Muris’ last job before
chairing the federal agency that regulates multi-level
marketing was as an attorney with
the antitrust division of the firm Howrey,
Simon, Arnold and White, LLP. The antitrust
division of Howrey counts among its largest
clients the Amway Corporation. While Muris
was with Howrey and while he was in charge of the
FTC, his former partners in the antitrust division
at Howrey represented Amway Corporation in a class
action lawsuit initiated by Joe Morrison, a former
Emerald-level distributor, in the US District Court
for the Southern District of Texas in 1998 (*).
The suit charged that the recruitment program of Amway
is an illegal pyramid scheme and was referred to mandatory
arbitration as outlined in Amway's distributor agreement,
so we may never know the outcome of the case. And
Amway's insider influence in the Bush administration
FTC extends beyond Chairman Muris. When the multi-level
marketing company Equinox International, an Amway
clone, was prosecuted for pyramid scheme fraud by
the FTC during the Clinton administration, one of
Equinox’s expert witnesses, David Scheffman,
testified against the FTC and on behalf of the scheme
(which was later shut down as part of a settlement).
Scheffman argued that the Equinox business model was
not a pyramid scheme. His claim was largely based
on the assertion that Equinox operated just like
Amway. Muris subsequently appointed
this same David Scheffman as the FTC’s new Chief
Economist (*,
*).
- Amway
is also aligned with the fundamentalist Christian
wing of the Republican party and has been accused
of mining trusting Christians. In her book Amway
Motivational Organizations: Behind the Smoke and Mirrors,
Ruth Carter notes that "conservative Christian
leaders James Dobson, and formerly
Jim and Tammi Bakker have been staunchly
pro-Amway, and claim friendships with Amway founders
and high-level distributors. Reverend Jerry
Falwell, who received massive donations from
Amway leaders, issued statements on the internet and
through Amway's voice messaging system supporting
Amway against its critics. Dexter Yager,
mentioned above with regards to the motivational business,
reportedly gave a whopping $100,000 to the Rev. Falwell's
Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia (*).
Author Charles Paul Conn, president
of Lee College, a small Christian college in Cleveland,
Tennessee, has written six books about the Amway business,
and was a favored speaker at Amway conventions for
a number of years; and a number of entertainers and
motivational speakers support the Amway business (*).
According to Amway whistleblower Eric Scheibeler's
Merchants of Deception (*),
"You were either a Republican Christian or
you would become one if you maintained any level of
involvement [in Amway]. There was a constant
level of conservative political promotion and religious
services at seminars." Scheibeler also noted
that many high profile individuals from outside the
corporate world of Amway lent their credibility, both
indirectly and directly, which was used to drive recruitment.
Such figures included George Bush Sr.,
George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan,
Gerald Ford, Senator Rick
Santorum, Jack Kemp, Mary
Lou Retton, Jerry Falwell,
Billy Zeoli (president of Gospel
Films Inc.), Charles Stanley, Robert
Schuller, Dave Thomas, Dennis
Waitely, Zig Ziglar, Oliver
North, and Newt Gingrich.
Because of the conservative Christian messages touted
at seminars and the fact that high-level distributors
discouraged their downlines from associating with
"loser" outsiders, including family, Amway
gained a cult-like reputation. Some
distributors even used their church congregations
for recruiting, earning them the derogatory title
of "Amway Christian" (*).
At least one Amway official hinted at an admission
of the problem -- a 1985 Forbes Article reports:
"Last year DeVos and Van Andel brought in William
Nicholson, former president Gerald Ford's
appointment secretary, to reorganize Amway. Nicholson
says the firm is cleansing the sales force, and there
is a new approach, downplaying evangelism and
cultism and emphasizing real sales training instead"
(*).
Outside
of Amway, this strategy of some MLMers worked so well
for recruitment that Dr. Jon Taylor, President of
the Consumer Awareness Institute and author of the
anti-MLM website www.mlm-thetruth.com, even found
it necessary, based on his experience with MLMs infiltrating
religious congregations, to warn MLM-heavy Utah's
Mormon population against MLMers out seeking recruits
from among them (*).
Clearly
some in Amway, the Mother of all MLMs, saw the potential
in aligning themselves with others who believed in American
free enterprise and Christian values -- and then abused
those relationships. I'm certain that many religious
leaders and politicians are thankful for the financial
support but don't understand the entire reasons behind
the causes and legislation they're then asked to push
on behalf of their benefactors. And then again, some probably
know full well what they're doing.
1994-1996's
NuSkin case: FTC begins new crusade against pyramid schemes
The
Democratic presidency of Bill Clinton from 1993-2001 released
the hounds on MLMs, pyramid schemes, and "business
opportunity frauds". FTC Chairman Pitofsky (D) noted
the meteoric rise in "business opportunity"
frauds about which consumer complaints surged
in the 1980s and 1990s (*),
and in April 1995 he began soliciting public comments
about the possible inadequacy of the Franchise and Business
Opportunity Rule (the "Franchise Rule"). He
described the biz op problem in a February
1996 warning to consumers thusly: "Lured by deceptive
promises of independence and easy income, many would-be
entrepreneurs are jumping into the arms of con artists
who claim: 'we are not just selling you a business, we
put you IN business'", further calling the problem
"epidemic"(*).
During
his six-year tenure, while still forumulating criteria
for a possible new Franchise Rule, he successfully applied
the FTC Act and Franchise and Business Opportunity rule
to fine many MLMs and like businesses into bankruptcy.
The cases involved MLMs as well as promoters selling "franchises"
of vending machines, pay telephones, medical billing,
and envelope-stuffing schemes.
In
1994, the FTC went after NuSkin alleging unsubstantiated
claims for the income opportunity and products. A regime
change occurred in the FTC in 1995 when Democratic President
Clinton replaced the Republican Steiger with the Democratic
Pitofsky as FTC Chairman. In 1997, NuSkin paid a $1.5
million civil penalty to settle the case but came under
scrutiny for continuing to disobey the 1994 FTC Order
against it -- with the FTC failing to enforce the Order
and assess further consequential penalties (*).
But it would be disingenuous to be critical of FTC Chairman
Pitofsky as being too soft, as he proved quite the pitbull
for the remainder of his term until Republican President
George Bush replaced him with Timothy
Muris in 2001. The MLM industry did begin to note
the pattern under Pitofsky: MLMs were ambushed, with the
FTC often gaining injunctions that froze assets as it
fined the targeted MLM for FTC violations, often to the
point of bankruptcy and without the MLM ever admitting
guilt.
NuSkin
also sold products under the names of Pharmanex, Big Planet,
Photomax, and IDN (Interior Design Nutritionals). In 2005
and 2006, Nu Skin communicators (based in Utah), aided
by the DSA, lobbied for state legislation (SB
182) removing the requirement for direct selling to
"legitimate end customers" ("personal
use") in Utah's Pyramid Scheme Act -- and
got it.
1996's
Omnitrition case: FTC challenges "personal use"
In
1996 the FTC under Pitofsky (D) began revisiting the issue
of chain-recruiting in the aftermath of a 1994 civil class
action suit against Omnitrition (Webster v. Omnitrition
International [*]).
The case boiled down to the suspicion that most distributors
were simply selling to their own downlines based on Omnitrition's
misrepresentations that all participants had an equal
opportunity to get rich by building endless downlines,
which had already been noted by the FTC as deceptive because
it was impossible due to market saturation.
Omnitrition defended that its compensation program was
similar to Amway's; the court found that the existence
of the Amway Safeguards was at a minimum no good without
enforcement. The
court also reinforced via an in dicta opinion
(statements made by the court but not part of the holding
itself) that the amount of focus a company places
on retailing versus recruiting is a key determinant of
whether or not it is a pyramid scheme (*)
(same as was established in 1975's Koscot), i.e. sales
to persons who are participants in the company's compensation
program do not qualify as "retail sales" for
purposes of satisfying the Koscot test. Regarding Koscot:
"[...]
recruitment with rewards unrelated to product sales
is nothing more than an elaborate chain letter device
in which individuals who pay a valuable consideration
with the expectation of recouping it to some degree
via recruitment are bound to be disappointed (Webster
v. Omnitrition International [*])"
And
now Omnitrition's in dicta language
which referenced Koscot:
"[...]
plaintiffs have produced evidence that the [Amway] 70%
rule can be satisfied by a distributor's personal
use of the products. If Koscot is to have
any teeth, such a sale cannot satisfy the
requirement that sales be to 'ultimate users' of a product."
(Webster v. Omnitrition International [*])
The
case settled out of court, but the Direct Selling Association
(DSA), an association of direct distribution companies,
recognized the potential for the in dicta opinion
on "personal use" to impact the MLM industry
and filed a 1996 amicus brief (friend of the court) in
support of Omnitrition. Now, the old DSA c. 1990 whose
MLM members only comprised 25% of its membership roster
would have had little reason to defend "personal
use", as their majority traditional single-level
direct sellers had as their end users consumers exclusively
outside the scheme; there was no incentive for end users
to participate in order to buy products. The new DSA c.
1996 clearly had a majority of MLM members now who had
a stake in sales to participants inside the scheme;
in fact, the DSA argued in its ignored amicus brief:
"...
consumption by participants of direct selling
companies' products is a natural and appropriate
element of direct sales. [...] It is an axiom of
direct selling that a company must successfully
market its products to its own distributors if it is
to have any hope that its distributors will successfully
market its products and its opportunity to others.
[...] Sales to distributors and their use of a plan's
products can be crucial to the success of a bona fide
direct selling company (*)."
The
DSA was arguing in essence that the court's
attack on "personal use" based on the Koscot
test was an attack on the very structure of MLM
based on a "misunderstanding" of how MLM worked.
The problem that Koscot recognized with "personal
use" was that those at the bottom of a saturated
MLM, comprising mathematically in fact the vast majority
of MLM members, should of necessity be selling retail
to nonparticipants since the incentive to recruit was
no longer present. The DSA was arguing that the Koscot
test did not apply to unsaturated MLMs. The DSA
seemed to have a point, but the problem then with an unsaturated
MLM with a focus on "personal use" was that
it risked triggering onerous laws regulating "buying
clubs" (also called buyer's or merchandise clubs)
that could impede business (*),
including registration with the state (usually the Attorney
General), the posting of a bond, the payment of registration
fees, establishing trust accounts or escrow accounts for
prepayments of fees collected from buyers (*),
and, sometimes, complying with a requirement that savings
claims made by the buying club must be based on price
comparisons with area retailers comparing like items;
violators of these myriad and inconsistent federal and
state laws could be faced with severe penalties, including
injunctive action. Because the risks substantially decline
below a minimum investment level, statutes defining business
opportunities contain minimum initial investment threshold
exemptions; the FTC's Franchise and Business Opportunity
Rule of the time stated the minimum threshold as $500.00.
Take note of that amount, as it will come back to haunt
the MLM industry later!
In order to avoid the onerous restrictions involved
with being classified as a buying club, MLM had to eliminate
all recruiting based on the attractiveness of buying wholesale.
Thus the only reason a new recruit would join an MLM had
to be based on the business opportunity, an opportunity
that may not be viable because MLM by
its very structure has no controls to determine at what
point market saturation occurs. The court was
correct in attacking MLM's structure (again); a prevalence
of "personal use" among MLM distributors was
definitely evidence that the income opportunity drove
endless chain recruitment, i.e. recruiting was emphasized
over retailing.
The
Omnitrition court affirmed that the Koscot test
was necessary, though it never explicitly noted the buying
club connection and thus failed to fully understand exactly
why the Koscot test was necessary. The court
also affirmed that the Amway safeguards were still sound
but emphasized that they needed to be enforced in order
to be a defense. However, a second look reveals that Amway
itself could not have been enforcing the Safeguards. Recall
this quote:
"The
average monthly BV [Business Volume]
of Amway distributors in fiscal [...]
197374 [...] was about $33 a month. Much
of this amount is consumed by the distributors themselves
rather than resold. [...] Many of them
consume large amounts of the products every month.
[...] We note that this figure is not 'retail
sales', but Business Volume that
is, the retail value of the products purchased for resale
to consumers and sponsored distributors, and for distributor
home consumption, which was stated before,
constitutes a large portion of all sales of
Amway products." ( FTC
v. Amway, 1979 [*])
Only
about 25% of Amway distributors as of that case sponsored
new distributors (*).
Clearly it wasn't for lack of trying, since buying club
appeals were out and the biz op was the only reason to
participate.
In
affirming the use of a definition that excluded self-consumption
of products from the "retail sales" requirements
of the Koscot case, the Sixth Circuit endorsed the position
taken by the FTC and the Omnitrition court, and specifically
pointed out that a basis for the Koscot case was the extensive
self-consumption of products by the scheme's participants
rather than actual retail customers. The court concluded:
Given
the district court's instruction that a pyramid exists
when a program's rewards relate to recruitment, not
product sales, the jury necessarily found the possibility
of saturation when it found that the defendants ran
a pyramid scheme: "The presence of this second
element, recruitment with rewards unrelated to product
sales, is nothing more than an elaborate chain letter
device in which individuals who pay a valuable consideration
with the expectation of recouping it to some degree
via recruitment are bound to be disappointed."
Omnitrition, 79 F.3d at 781 (quoting Koscot). (*)
1996's
Fortuna Alliance case: FTC reinforces retailing over recruiting
In
May 1996 the FTC pursued Fortuna Alliance on grounds that
although it appeared to be offering consumer benefits
services, in reality it was selling positions in an opportunity
with the right to secure others to do the same. (Recall
that 1975's Koscot case found that selling positions in
an opportunity constituted a security.) The FTC also charged
that Alliance was inducing consumers to join the scheme
with false income claims. (*)
In February 1997 Alliance settled, agreeing to repay around
$5.5 million in redress to consumers. In the final settlement,
Fortuna Alliance was permitted to pay commissions on the
sale of goods and services, but it was strictly prohibited
from paying commissions on membership fees or dues,
because those purchases were of "business centers".
However,
Fortuna Alliance violated the FTC's Order and dragged
its feet with repayment, moving assets and operations
offshore in a Fortuna II scheme, claiming:
"One
of the most important changes in Fortuna Alliance II
will be that the company will maintain its operations
off-shore from each and every country where it will
do business. This means that a 'raid' by a governmental
agency which put Fortuna Alliance out of business without
a warning or a trial to prove guilt of any kind,
will never happen again." (*)
The
FTC pursued Fortuna Alliance once again in October 1997,
and after being charged with contempt, Fortuna finally
complied with the Order and paid. In any case, MLMs took
notice as the FTC was able to effectively shut down, even
only temporarily, MLMs suspected of being pyramid schemes
before the crimes were ever proven in a court of law.
They also took note of the prohibition against paying
commissions on membership fees or dues, as some MLMs selling
discount buying, travel, and consumer benefits packages
also took note of the FTC's prohibition against paying
commissions on membership fees or dues, though in the
Fortuna Alliance case the prohibition specifically referred
to dues related to purchases of "business centers"
(which constituted unregistered securities).
1997's
Jewelway case: FTC formulating criteria for Biz Op Rule
review
In
1997 the FTC ambushed MLM Jewelway, alleging it was an
illegal pyramid scheme that emphasized recruiting over
retailing. Jewelway, its assets frozen under temporary
restraining order, agreed under duress to exactly the
language that had been so dangerous in Omnitrition: Jewelway
's sales revenue must come "primarily from retail
sales" to nonparticipants (*).
In addition, Jewelway agreed to some very onerous restrictions
in order to enforce compliance so Jewelway could continue
its business. Among other things, the settlement required
Jewelway to:
- disclose
the percentage of all representatives in the program
who have received a particular reward (e.g., a specific
income level, car or home allowance, vacation package)
at the time a claim is made regarding income potential
or likelihood of earning other types of rewards;
- implement
a 90 day "cooling off" period,
under which the purchaser of JewelWay's jewelry cannot
join the company as a representative for 90 days;
- review
all representatives' advertisements before allowing
the ads to run;
- obtain
from each new representative a signed verification
form, which the defendants must review before depositing
any of the representative's money, to ensure that
none of the prohibited claims were made (if the defendants
do not receive a completed verification form from
a consumer, the purchase price must be refunded).
(The
above rules will later be the foundation for the FTC's
2006 Proposed Business Opportunity Rule.)
Note
that the above requirements infringed upon the rep's independent
contractor status by exerting control over the method
in which he ran his "business" (in case he wasn't
already restricted enough). The message sent was clear:
Jewelway could now be held responsible for infractions
by its distributors. It also set the stage for independent
contractors to possibly challenge their status as employee
misclassification. Jewelway filed for bankruptcy around
1999 (*).
1997's
World Class Network case: More of the same
World
Class Network was a multi-level marketer of travel agent
credentials that the FTC charged with running a pyramid
scheme which drove recruitment by misrepresenting its
services and income opportunity. WCN's own records indicated
that only about 4 percent of the more than 51,000 purchasers
earned more than $1,000 in commissions in 1996, and that
more than 35,000 of the network members received no commissions
at all last year (*).
Similar to Jewelway, the FTC required among the stipulations
in its consent judgment that WCN:
- implement
a program under which consumers could receive refunds
of 100 percent of the purchase price within 45 days
of the date of purchase, and 90 percent within 46 to
90 days of the purchase date;
-
implement a 90 day "cooling off" period
for sales of travel tutorial kits under which the purchaser
cannot become a travel agent or a distributor for 90
days;
- obtain
from each purchaser a written verification form ensuring
that the prohibited claims were not made before depositing
any of the purchaser's money;
- review
all distributors’ advertisements before
allowing the ads to run;
- disclose,
in connection with any earnings claims made, the
number of purchasers who made at least the amount claimed
and the percentage of total purchasers who earned that
amount.
(Note
once again how these rules will later form a foundation
for the
FTC's 2006 Proposed Business Opportunity
Rule.)
1998's
Futurenet case: FTC retreats a step on "personal
use"
Since
1996's Omnitrition case, the MLM industry was on somewhat
thin ice regarding "personal use." In Futurenet's
case, the FTC alleged that, like Fortuna Alliance, the
Futurenet program was a pyramid scheme in which individuals
made money by recruiting others who paid "training"
fees to purchase "positions". In the JewelWay
case, the majority of the sales revenue approach had been
applied to the entire company, but in Futurenet, the majority
sales revenue approach was applied to individual distributors,
i.e. compensation to the individual distributor must be
based primarily on retail sales. This
time it allowed that retail sales could also include reasonable
distributor "personal use" purchases not to
exceed $30/month (service contracts) or $360/year (single
purchase items) (*).
This deterred inventory loading, the bugbear of the Omnitrition
case, but removed the consumer protections against "closed
system" buyer clubs in which distributors were encouraged
to buy, even in small amounts, only to participate in
the endless chain commissions. This new standard only
led to more FTC micromanagement and confusion.
Of
note here is that the FTC did approve the payment of the
recruitment (training) fees, a practice heretofore consistently
condemned as one of the hallmarks of a pyramid scheme
-- but commissions on recruitment could only penetrate
one level deep (*).
1999's
2Xtreme case: FTC questions "closed system"
buying clubs
Of
note in this case is the fact that 2Xtreme Performance
International sold training materials, a practice vaguely
approved of in Futurenet, but the FTC took notice and
disapproved this time because the training materials were
required as mandatory purchases in order to earn
2Xtreme commissions. The training materials (and commissions
paid on them) served only those within the MLM (a closed
system), had no value to those outside and were even of
questionable value to those inside -- the Dallas BBB had
received many complaints a year before from consumers
who complained they lost money because of income misrepresentations
and dodgy buyback policies. Also of note is this comment
by Jodie Bernstein, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer
Protection: "[The 2Xtreme] scheme produced the same
results all pyramids do: most consumers lost their
money" (*).
Suddenly, it looked like the only criterion for the FTC
to prove that an MLM was a pyramid scheme was to simply
prove that most participants lost money. Of course, proving
this was far more difficult than it sounds on the surface,
but the FTC was gaining some momentum in prosecuting pyramid
schemes.
2000's
Equinox International (Trek Alliance): FTC finds Amway
defense inadequate again
In
a case culminating in 2000,
the FTC charged Equinox
International with being an illegal pyramid scheme.
The founder invoked the Amway defense and the FTC again
found it again inadequate without enforcement. Without
admitting any wrongdoing, he settled, liquidating assets
of about $40 million to satisfy the terms, as well as
being barred for life from ever again engaging in MLM
operations (*).
2001's
BigSmart case: FTC again finds "independent contractor"
defense inadequate
According
to the FTC, Bigsmart.com claimed that customers would
make "substantial money" by participating in
the company's e-tail program. The FTC alleged that Bigmart.com's
claims were false and were intended to recruit more participants
to buy the welcome pages (*).
In
May 2001 BigSmart settled with FTC, paying $5 million
in consumer redress. Of note is the fact that BigSmart,
like so many MLMs before it, attempted to blame its independent
contractor work force for the violations (*),
which you might recall backfired in 1997's Jewelway case.
Two of the promoters were previously high-level distributors
with Equinox International (mentioned above)(*).
2001's
Skybiz case: FTC finds 96% of participants lost money
In
May 2001 the FTC charged that Skybiz was a classic pyramid
scheme in which promoters misrepresented the income opportunity
and products. Evidence showed at least 96% of participants
lost money in the scheme. The 2002 settlement provided
for $20 million in redress to consumers and barred the
promoters from participating in or encouraging others
to start another MLM for a specified number of years (*).
I believe this was Democratic FTC Chairman Pitofsky's
last significant case against pyramid schemes; President
George W. Bush replaced him with Timothy
Muris (R) in June.
2001-2009:
FTC goes relatively silent regarding MLMs
You
might remember George W. Bush (R) appointed pro-MLM Timothy
Muris in June 2001. Below is a chart indicating the
above-mentioned FTC lawsuits and during whose administration
they occurred. Note how the FTC went relatively quiet
on MLMs after Muris's appointment and throughout the subsequent
Republican-led chairmanships.
FTC
Chairmen Designated by the Presidents from 1975 to 2009
(*):
- 1970-1973
(R) Kirkpatrick ---- initiated Koscot
-
1973-1975 (R) Engman -------1975 Koscot, and Amway investigation
begins
- 1976-1976
(D) Dixon (Acting)
- 1976-1977
(R) Collier
- 1977-1981
(D) Pertschuk------1979 Amway concludes
- 1981-1981
(R) Clanton (Acting)
- 1981-1985
(R) Miller
- 1985-1986
(R) Calvani (Acting)
- 1986-1989
(R) Oliver
- 1989-April
1995 (R) Steiger--------- 1994 NuSkin (but FTC failed
to adequately enforce the Order)
- April
1995-May 31, 2001 (D) Pitofsky-------- Charged
with being pyramid schemes: 1996 Omnitrition; 1996 Fortuna
Alliance; 1997 Jewelway; 1997 World Class Network; 1998
Futurenet; 1999 2Extreme; 2000 Equinox; 2001 Bigsmart;
2001 Skybiz. Also conducted enforcement sweeps of allegedly
fraudulent "business opportunities" like Projects
Telesweep, Buylines, Missed Fortune, Vend-Up Broke,
and Biz-illion$ (*).
- June
2001-2004 (R) Muris
- 2004-2008
(R) Majoras
- 2008-2009
(R) Kovacic
- March
2009-present (D) Jon Liebowitz
It's
very possible I've missed mention of actions above, but
most sources I read seemed to agree that the above cases
were the most significant regarding MLMs.
In
2003, spurred into action by the FDA, Muris did initiate
regulatory actions against an MLM called Seasilver for
making false and unsubstantiated claims -- but he did
not allege it ran a pyramid scheme. Muris did appear to
have teeth when he put a stipulation in the consent order
that if Seasilver failed to pay the $3 million owed to
consumers in redress, it would trigger a penalty increase
to $120 million (*),
and he did enforce it when Seasilver failed to comply.
Seasilver was forced into bankruptcy (*).
Otherwise, the FTC remained fairly quiet on MLMs for seven
years of Republican rule.
You
will recall that previous FTC Chairman Pitofsky (D) noted
the meteoric rise in "business opportunity"
frauds in the 1980s and 1990s and had instigated a 1995
regulatory review of the Franchise and Business Opportunity
Rule. Though he had prosecuted "franchise" and
MLM promoters of "business opportunities," establishing
in 1997's Jewelway and World Class Network cases some
guidelines under which such business opportunities should
be permitted to operate, the job of actually revising
the Franchise Rule fell to successor after successor as
the Rule remained in question.
In April 2006, the FTC under Chairman Deborah Majoras
(R) followed up and issued the Initial Proposed Business
Opportunity Rule (IPBOR), which included many of the base
criteria Pitofsky had outlined. The original 1978 Franchise
Rule had covered only business opportunities and franchises
in which the buyer's initial purchase was $500 or more,
as that was believed to cover most get-rich-quick schemes
of the time, but the new proposed Rule would also cover
MLM business opportunities, erasing the $500 minimum payment
requirement that had previously classified the opportunity
as subject to the Rule.
When
the FTC solicited public comments, the vast majority of
the 17,000 comments came from the MLM industry (*),
urged on by the DSA to send form letters objecting to
the Rule. These commenters urged the Commission to narrow
the scope of the IPBOR, to implement various safe-harbor
provisions, and/or to reduce the required disclosures.
For instance, DSWA
(Direct Selling Women's Alliance) stated these reasons,
which are rather representative of the industry, as their
primary objections:
- The
required disclosure and earnings statements
and the required list of all distributors who have cancelled
their distributorship in the previous last two years
may cause the sponsoring process to become cumbersome
and difficult. (Ya think?!)
-
These requirements may create unnecessary alarm
and concern about the legitimacy of the profession
and your business opportunity to prospective
distributors. (Unnecessary?!)
- The
proposed seven day waiting period between receiving
the disclosures and enrollment would likely
cause a potential distributor to lose their enthusiasm
for joining your company. (God forbid a
prospect actually THINKS about a business decision that
could sink them into massive debt over time.)
-
The costs of complying with the requirements would
increase expenses to the company which may
be passed on through the selling price of goods or services
we offer. (You've GOT to be kidding.)
Only
a handful of comments were submitted by non-MLM companies
and industry groups; 85 congressmen also objected to the
Rule (*),
urged on by DSA & MLM interests. Of this there is
no doubt; see this
letter and this
letter from senator Mel Martinez [R-FL]; he received
donations
in the past from Richard Devos of MLM Amway. (Athough
he lives in Michigan, Devos owns Florida's Orlando Magic
sports team and was named by the Orlando Sentinel as #15
of the "25 Most Important People in Central Florida
[*].)
See also this
letter from senator Mike Crapo [R-ID] on behalf of
MLMs Stampin' Up and XELR8. Those are but a few.
On
March 18, 2008, the Direct Selling Association (DSA) and
MLM lobby scored a major victory when the FTC, now under
Chairman Kovacic (R), announced that it was seeking to
modify the Proposed Business Opportunity Rule to exempt
MLMs (*),
as they determined the potential harm to that industry
could outweigh any benefit in preventing fraud. This is
completely at odds with a 2007 letter from the FTC under
Majoras to Senator Martinez which stated:
"The
requirement to provide this disclosure document would
cover all types of business opportunity sellers, including
those employing the multi-level marketing -
or 'direct sales' - model. In the
Commission's enforcement experience, fraudulent businesses
have often passed themselves off as legitimate companies
that use this business model" (*).
The
FTC will never put any teeth in the Biz Op Rule if it
continues to bow to lobbying by every industry that fears
that telling the truth about their "income opportunities"
will (rightfully so!) impede their ability to conduct
and even continue their businesses. I am incredulous that
MLMs are permitted to continue skirting laws of even basic
common sense using vagaries; indeed the only reasons they
are not considered franchise opportunities is that they
do not "sell the opportunity" - though they
may sell a product, specifically a kit, that "informs"
the prospect how to conduct his business - and the initial
purchase price is less then $500. The fact of the matter
is that recruiting is done face-to-face largely with friends
and family members for a reason, with participants being
not only taught but TRAINED by their uplines to "duplicate
themselves", and then "helping" (read:
training) recruits to do the same. MLMs can't
assign territories without triggering laws that risk their
independent contractor sales force being classified as
employees either - but that also forces the largely
inexperienced and unsophisticated sales force to market
blindly and inefficiently without regard to inevitable
market saturation. As 1975's FTC v Koscot noted:
"[...]
even where rewards are based upon sales to consumers,
a scheme which represents indiscriminately to
all comers that they can recoup their investments by
virtue of the product sales of their recruits must end
up disappointing those at the bottom who can find no
recruits capable of making retail sales."
(FTC v. Koscot Interplanetary 86 F.T.C. 1106, 1975)
(*)
...
and 1979's FTC v Amway noted:
The
complaint alleges that distributors are not
long likely to recruit other distributors because 'recruitment
of additional participants must of necessity ultimately
collapse when the number of personal theretofore recruited
has so saturated the area with distributors or dealers
as to render it virtually impossible to recruit others.'"(FTC
v. Amway, 1979) (*)
The
business model itself is the problem. In 2005, Dr Jon
Taylor of www.mlm-thetruth.com did an
evaluation of the compensation systems of some 150
MLMs and concluded that only three -- Avon, Pampered Chef,
and Stampin' Up -- rewarded retailing over recruiting.
When I checked that list again in 2009, the total MLMs
evaluated had grown to over 250, and only Pampered
Chef passed Taylor's compensation structure test,
and even then that one was rated as only better than the
rest. Dr Taylor also conducted a
statistical analysis of income disclosures made by 10
representative major multi-level marketing (MLM) companies
and the largest of all MLMs, Amway/Quixtar; results revealed
that, on average, more than 99% of all MLM
participants never realize ANY net income
(*)
from rebates, commissions or bonuses [...] and
in fact LOSE money (*).
The "intolerable potential to deceive" pointed
out in the 1979 Amway case has only proven all too real.
It
is my hope that the good, trusting people who are participating
or considering participating in an MLM will find this
article and take it to heart, as my only purpose in writing
it was for purposes of helping them protect themselves.
It is also my hope that regulatory agencies, including
the FTC, will finally understand how they've been snowed
and move towards stronger regulation of the MLM industry.
They can continue fining offenders into bankruptcy after
the vast majority of the damage is done, but far better
would be regulations targeted at ensuring consumers receive
all material facts up front so they can make truly informed
choices before the brainwashing begins.
President
Barack Obama's new FTC Chairman as of March 2009 is Jon
Liebowitz (D). You may contact the FTC and other regulatory
agencies and your state's Attorney General by using the
links listed on this page.
|
IV.
Complaints Against MLMs Outside the
Financial Services Industry
Your
firm may not call itself an MLM,
but if it utilizes any MLM practices (commission-only
direct sales to mainly friends and family, bonuses to recruit others;
and baser practices such as ongoing training programs and training
materials that recruits are pressured to pay for, cattle-call interviews/inductions,
misrepresenting the average income of reps to attract recruits,
a cultic atmosphere that discourages "negative influences",
etc.), it may share
something in common with the following companies: a
similar pattern of complaints.
This
list is by no means exhaustive regarding companies or lists of complaints
against them, but it's quite a large list in itself. Company links
go to their official sites for balance. Some websites are now defunct,
whether the site operator simply lost interest or was sued to force
site closure or remove specific information. As with most any defunct
website, you can use the Internet Archive "Wayback
Machine" at http://www.archive.org
to view historical captures.
- ACN,
Inc. - (sells telecom services)
- Exposing
the Truth About ACN MLM. Alleges: misrepresentation of
business opportunity, average (expected) incomes, chances
of "success"; cult mentality; promotion of abuse
of friendships.
- Scam.com
message board thread (Archived, so not all pages may show.)
Long thread alleges: high pressure sales tactics; salespeople
seem desperate; deceptive advertising; only way to make money
is to recruit; cult mentality; high dropout rate; inferior
products, training, and customer service.
- The
Millenium Project (archived) has a page on ACN. Alleges:
deceptive advertising; Canadian regulatory authorities charged
ACN with illegal pyramiding; Australian authorities ruled
ACN an illegal pyramid; ACN
apparently attempted to silence website with SLAPP suit.
- MLMWatchdog.com
has a page on ACN with the headline: "MLM ACN Australia
Shortest Launch and Shut down in History". Site is Pro-MLM.
- Amway
/ Quixtar
/ Alticor
/ Team
of Destiny - (sells variety of products; its old
staple was soap/detergent)
- The
Skeptic's Dictionary. Page critical of Amway. Note allegations
of: fantastic income appearances represented to recruits at
rallies; only the "elite" will succeed; recruit's
income increases are based on overrides on his sales force;
reference to cult-like mentality or atmosphere; "Friends
& Family List" is main "prospecting" tool.
- mlmSurvivor:
Amway vs. Critical Websites. Mentions examples of alleged
SLAPP suits in which Amway continued
naming critical websites as defendants in an apparently unrelated
case, ultimately forcing those critics to close their sites.
- A
1986
FTC Order determined that Amway had violated its
1979 FTC Order against making earnings claims for
its distributors without disclosing actual average gross income
figures.
- Avon
- (sells cosmetics)
- A
7/1/2004 PRNewswire
article discusses a recent court case which accuses Avon
of "channel stuffing", or artificially boosting
its financial bottom line by charging for and shipping unordered
products to sales representatives. Suggests an allegation
of misrepresentation of realistic average (expected) income
and artificial boosting of sales figures. In August 2004 the
California Court of Appeals dumped the case but then reinstated
it on appeal in May
2005. I can't seem to find any updates past that.
- Discovery
Toys - (sells educational toys)
- This
iVillage thread (archived; not all pages may display)
contains a few complaints implying misrepresentation of realistic
average (expected) income, discomfort of friends and family
as sales targets. Most of the pro-company posts sounded to
me like people in the early "emotionally charged"
stages common to MLMs and almost invariably include their
Discovery Toys websites, appearing to use the message board
in desperation for recruiting or sales.
- Equinox
International / Trek Alliance / Advanced Marketing Systems
/ BG Management - (sold water filters)
- This
1996 Santa
Clara Valley Metro article recounts (though rather sensationally)
several stories of failed reps who alleged: cult mentality;
misrepresentation of realistic average (expected) income;
heavy debts incurred by travel and other expenses encouraged
in a "fake it till you make it" program; music before
group interviews is purposely loud to discourage conversation
(negativity).
-
Was shut
down by FTC in April 2001 as an illegal pyramid scheme;
the Trek Alliance version was shut
down in 2003.
- Excel
Telecommunications / Vartec
Telecom - (sells long distance service)
- This
ComplaintStation.com
thread (archived, as website since shut down) alleges:
misrepresentation of realistic average (expected) income.
Note the replies by Excel supporters, which boil down to the
usual: "You have a bad attitude"; "You didn't
try hard enough".
- Health-Mor
/ FilterQueen
- (sells vacuum cleaners & air purifiers)
- This
blog
alleges: misrepresentation of job description; recruits must
provide own first 10 leads before receiving any from company;
abuse of trust relationships in selling to friends & family;
misclassification of employees as independent contractors.
- Herbalife
/ Newest Way to Wealth - (sells vitamins)
- This
complaint describes one woman's experience, which alleges:
front-loading of expensive inventory with a misleading refund
policy; a cult atmosphere; misrepresentation of realistic
average (expected) income; sales to friends and family (the
only sales she made); high-pressure recruiting tactics.
- Herbalife
settled a 1986
lawsuit filed by the California Attorney General. Allegations
included questionable claims made for products.
- Related
companies or divisions are Big Planet, Pharmanex, & Photomax.
- Cockeyed.com
has an amusing article
in which the author muses about Herbalife's MLM format, market
saturation, and the many "Lose Weight Now - Ask Me How"
type signs distributors plastered (illegally) all over Sacramento.
- RickRoss.com,
a website dedicated to the study of "destructive cults,
controversial groups and movement" like Heaven's Gate
and the Skinheads, includes a
page on Herbalife.
- A
testimonial reads: "My husband and I spent
over $8,000 in this business through inventory,
promotions, 'trainings,' travel, and marketing. We [...]
feel that it was the obligation of Herbalife [...]
to inform us of all the costs [...] before
having us sign. Herbalife's promotional materials are
clever. The costs are in the decision packets behind all
the wonderful testimonials, but the numbers were
either played down about costs and/or over inflated for
profits. And everyone was high on 'personal
development tapes'." (*)
- In
the 1997 case of Fallow
v Herbalife, Herbalife was successfully prosecuted
for breach of contract when it cut off a distributor's
income (effectively terminating him) and reassigned his
extensive downline to his upline. Of note: "Herbalife
went to great lengths to inform its Distributors that
they are 'independent contractors', and not employees,
with freedom to run "their own business." (Review
the "Independent
Contractor" section of this site!)
- Mannatech
- (sells nutritional supplements)
- RickRoss.com,
a website dedicated to the study of "destructive cults,
controversial groups and movement" like Heaven's Gate
and the Skinheads, includes a
page on Mannatech. Some articles:
- A
2007 Wall Street Journal article
demonstrates a few cases where Mannatech's independent
contractor sales force make spurious health claims based
on Mannatech's own published testimonials as well as at
"Mannafest", a yearly meeting for distributors
that approaches a religious revival in tone. (Mannatech's
founder is very religious; "manna" is the food
God miraculously supplied to the Israelites in scripture.)
- A
2007 ABC News 20/20 segment points out that Mannatech's
products sell so well that 'Forbes" magazine named
the company [...] one of the fastest growing companies
of 2006. (But note how they're doing
it!) The sales reps even coached potential recruits
on how to work around legal restrictions. For instance,
they cannot claim the product cures or treats anything,
but they can say "'I think I have something that
will help you with your cancer" (because the statement
is framed as the rep's own opinion). Note that
sales associates are legally
liable for any spurious claims they make, even if
they're simply repeating what the company has told them.
- In
February 2009 Mannatech settled a 2007 lawsuit
brought by the Texas Attorney General in which it was charged
with exaggerating health claims. Mannatech to pay $4 million
in consumer redress and $2 million for AG's investigation
costs.
- Mary
Kay - (sells cosmetics)
- See
post #2 in this
rather scathing ComplaintStation.com thread (archived,
as website since shut down) -- allegations are exaggerated
but may be pared down to: misrepresentation of realistic average
(expected) income; sales to friends and family; "warm
chatter" with strangers to generate leads; encouraging
front-loading of inventory "to succeed" (earn promotion
levels) and high-pressure sales tactics; salespeople must
pay to go to cultic pep rallies.
- MKSurvivors
is a Yahoo group; you need a Yahoo ID to sign up to read.
"We deal in facts about issues, income and the realities
of this business [...] we are a very diverse group of men
and women all with a goal to expose the truths about this
'opportunity' as well as MLM's."
- The
Pinking Shears is an anti-Mary Kay website created by
the founder of the MKSurvivors Yahoo group.
- Edumacation.com
has a message board section on Mary Kay. Allegations are all
the usual: front-loading of inventory; high pressure to recruit
and make continuing (unnecessary?) purchases to earn sales
rewards; marriages harmed when cultic atmosphere causes front-line
MK reps to dig the family into escalating debt behind partners'
backs; unauthorized credit card charges; abuse of personal
relationships; MK runs secondary "tools" business
similar to Amway; misrepresentations about actual earned incomes.
MK defenders counsel failures: "You didn't work the business
hard enough."
- A
2002
Law.com article says a jury in Texas hit Mary Kay Inc.
with an $11.2 million verdict, including $10 million in punitive
damages, for firing a sales manager disabled by cancer, who,
the company contended, was not an employee but an independent
contractor. May challenge IC status for all salespersons.
- Update
on Mary Kay v. Woolf: The 2002 decision was overturned.
Woolf was determined to be not an “employee” under
Texas law and thus not entitled to protection under California’s
anti-discrimination statute. Note that "The
5 Red Flags of Product-Based Pyramid Schemes" alleges
that Texas is among those states that inadvertently passed
deceptive DSA-promoted legislation that effectively "legalized
the worst pyramid schemes of all -- those that are product
based."
- Melaleuca
/ The M.O.M.
Team - (sells health products)
- This
mlmSurvivor.com
article alleges: misrepresentation of turnover rate.
- This
RipOffReport.com
page contains allegations of: misrepresentation of realistic
average (expected) income, cult-like atmosphere, straining
of relationships when selling to family and friends, obscuring
the name and/or nature of the business because of prior bad
publicity. Defenders use the same rote defenses ("you
didn't try hard enough", "you're a negative person
and I'm a positive one", citing company-provided propaganda).
- New
Vision International - (sells dietary supplements)
- A
1998
FTC Order decided that it made unsubstantiated claims
about one of its products. Two principals were formerly
with International Heritage, Inc. (IHI), a company prosecuted
by the SEC
on allegations of being an illegal pyramid scheme.
- This
peculiar page includes a New Vision recruit writing "We
ignored the 'walk on the beaches of the world with us'
scenario that our sponsor regurgitated and took a
realistic look at the effort involved, the return, and the
risk." Implies misrepresentation of realistic average
(expected) income. Defense is the usual, implying those who
failed "didn't try hard enough".
- NuSkin
/ Big
Planet / Pharmanex
/ Photomax
Studios - (sells health & beauty products, photo
services)
- This
Complaints.com post alleges front-loading of expensive
inventory with a misleading refund policy; misrepresentation
of realistic average (expected) income.
- A
1994
FTC Order ordered NuSkin to stop making questionable claims
about its products and income/success representations.
- The
FTC determined NuSkin had continued the same violations in
a 1997
FTC Order.
- Prepaid
Legal Services - (sells a sort of "legal insurance
policy")
- RipOffReport.com's
page on the company includes allegations of: misrepresentation
of realistic average (expected) income; misrepresentation
of turnover rate; nondisclosure of expected expenses; cult-like
meetings; products of questionable worth.
- World
Perfume - (sells perfumes/colognes)
- This
page alleges that Scentura
Creations is the same company, another incarnation,
or at a minimum very closely related.
- This
RipOffReport.com
page includes many allegations indentical to the points
made on this site (though I read it many months after having
written this site): misrepresentation of realistic average
(expected) income and job duties; corporate sidestepping of
legal responsibility by using recruits' "independent
contractor" status; sales to friends and family during
"training"; shutting down critical websites; cult-like
atmosphere; encouraging front-loading of inventory; nondisclosure
of expected expenses; cattle call interviews; obscuring the
name and/or nature of the business because of prior bad publicity.
V.
Complaints Against Specific Financial Services
Companies
Mention
of these companies does NOT imply they are running a scam! Many
have received many of the same complaints as the MLMs above;
this is by no means an exhaustive list of such firms and complaints
against them. Website owners/contributors are
sometimes angry and sensationalistic, feeling very betrayed by their
firm; I expect the reader to weed out bias and simply look at the
pattern of similar complaints, and to note just in general that
the firm has generated enough ill will as to earn such vocal critics
at all. Do your own research and don't forget to search the message
boards here and on this site's "Networking"
page -- you may just find something on your own company.
Company
links go to their official sites for balance. Some websites are
now defunct, whether the site operator simply lost interest or was
sued to force site closure or remove specific information. As with
most any defunct website, you can use the Internet Archive
"Wayback Machine" at http://www.archive.org
to view historical captures.
- AFLAC
- Indeed.com's
Jobs Forum participants allege:
-
"The
only money I spent was $38 for my business card in the
first four months. I have since spent several
thousand by choice as I am in business for myself.
[...] You have to understand that you are starting a
business - not just getting a job." (This person
should read the "Independent
Contractor" section of this site!)
- "If
you work a little, you will more than pay for [your insurance
license]. Plus you can write it off." [No,
that isn't necessarily true!] "You are an independent
agent. It's an entrepreneur job. Having
your own business means putting some [...] money into
it at first." (Same as above.)
- "[...]
new hires shouldn't be paying out of pocket to
train unless they have bought into a bona
fide franchise." (This person, an experienced
salesperson, gets it.)
- "All
they're doing is trying to fish unhappy losers, brainwash
them [...] by using words like 'be your
own business' or 'you're a professional entrepreneur',
or 'make residual income', 'be rich and retire early',
'financial security'... etc."
- "As
far as a "pyramid scheme job", I've never seen
a "pyramid scheme job" make it as high on the
Forbes 500 list as they have..."
(Another person who should read this site and understand
just how scams do exactly this!)
- "Employee
turnover rate is over the top, [...] and
then YOU OWE AFLAC, because they advance you the commissions."
(Advance
on commissions = LOAN!)
- "If
you last 1 year, you have done better than 95% of all
hired agents. You MUST have another job to pay your bills."
- "They
will tell you that the saturation is less than 5%, but
I found this to be misleading. All of the successful
agents [...] got into Aflac 10 years ago when there were
plenty of new accounts to open! Now it is very difficult,
if not impossible, to find a big account that has not
seen or heard of Aflac."
- "AFLAC
has a good product. They just need to get organized and
stop hiring anyone that has a pulse. I own a
business and have AFLAC, but I still have 3 or 4 different
people come in a month to try an schedule an appointment."
- "You
have to find your own prospects, and so many people have
tried to sell AFLAC that employers are hounded continually
by AFLAC. [...] The market is SATURATED
with AFLAC sales people."
- "If
it is your ONLY source of income, don't do it. There
are more agents than fleas, saturation is an understatement."
- Ameriprise
Financial
(formerly American Express Financial Advisors
[AEFA])
- Amexsux.com.
I found a number of complaints on the "Financial"
and "Employee" message boards alleging all the usual.
A small sampling:
- Thread
1. "You have to sit through a sales pitch. It's
very 'pyramid-schemesque' where they
try to show you million dollar earners and the great opportunity
and wow you while making you question your own instincts."
- Thread
2. "This kind of job is not rewarding unless
you like working 80 hour weeks and getting a salary (18,000)
which turns out in fact to be a draw system--not
a salary."
- Thread
3."AmEx advisers in the field, however, say that
entry-level advisers are experiencing close to 100%
turnover and that the newly established
franchisee advisers are essentially subsidizing the entire
product sales system."
- Thread
4. "After working there, I realized that the
business model at AEFA was about as close to a
pyramid scam as a legit company can get. For
example: A main focus of a managers duties where
to dial resumes off of monster.com, jobsearch.com,
etc. [...] to constantly get new advisors in the
door. Many of these new advisors where totally
unqualified. As a matter of fact,we hired one guy who
didn't even finish highschool."
- Thread
5.
Also alleges that New England Financial is doing the same.
- Thread
6. "[You pay] the license study marterials out
of your own funds, around 3 grand. This is a glorified
sales job! [...] You have to be willing to bring
your own leads." Another person wrote: "The
managers, recruiters, etc. are using you for your
natural market [friends and family]. The turnover
rate for new advisors has to be very
high. At the office I interviewed at, they have
group orientations or career previews every week.
Recruiting is non-stop."
- Jobvent
users have posted a few interesting comments:
- "[AEFA]
are hiring constantly yet you
never see anyone stay very long. You have to
pay an 'admin' fee of up to $300 just to start
and that is after you pay to get licensed through your
state. I heard all sorts of claims about free leads (union
leads) and how everyone was making over 100K a
year but I never met anyone who actually grossed that."
- "They
tell you when they hire you that you will receive 70 leads
a week. I got 50 my first week, 35 my second week and
zero my third week. I think I finally got 70 my 4th week,
but about 20% of them had no phone numbers. Oh, and they
give the same leads to more than one agent!"
- Some
posters on MyMoneyBlog
write:
- "[Ameriprise]
hires kids off the street because those kids have
parents that just might have ... money. So, kids
are hired and told to go after their ‘natural narket’.
I have seen terrible, expensive portfolios set up by ‘advisors’
that was a close friends or a relative of the client.
And when the client questioned the advisor about the fees
(that I had to tell them about–the trusted advisor/friend/relative
never did!!), the trusted friendly advisor turned ugly.
Ameriprise does not ‘advise’. They sell…
they find a way to fit what makes them the most money
into the client’s ‘plan’."
- "The
recruiters for this position are [...] more aggressive
than any other job/position I have ever applied for. I
do not possess a college degree, but I have extensive
sales experience. I asked [the Ameriprise recruiter] how
do I obtain clients in my first month assuming I know
nothing? He told me I would have to contact my “natural
market” ie, family, friends, people I trust.
In other words, I know nothing, but I should take
people whom I know and use them for their money and possibly
mis-invest it? It was such an obvious scam."
- To
Ameriprise's credit, they do have a page on their website
explaining how their three different types of financial advisor
positions are compensated. I am curious if the "salary"
they advertise is still a draw.
- American
Income Life
- Scam.com.
This
thread presents both sides from people who have worked
for AIL. Some negative claims concern high turnover,
brainwashing those who wish to leave into
believing they've "failed"; managers making higher
commissions on recruits less than 6 months old (discouraging
retention because company keeps commission trails); promises
of "unlimited income" that rarely pans out
while recruits are suckered into paying for everything including
rah-rah conventions in exotic locales; the company encourages
recruits to put the job over their family; all the usual.
One AIL defender amusingly says: "after 10 years with
the company i can retire!! yeah thats right retire so while
the rest of you work till your 65 i'll be 40 on some tropical
island". One complainant only learned about his "independent
contractor" status when he attempted to claim unemployment!
- What's
Up With American Income Life? (Archived) Contact insurance
investigator Mark Colbert at www.markcolbert.com
or email
him.
- RipOffReport.com.
Below are a few; search the site for more. Note
that AIL is a member of RipOffReport's Corporate
Advocacy Program; they pay RipOffReport for their "investigation"
and "approval" as a company consumers should "have
confidence in". I personally appreciate RipOffReport's
value as a site where consumers can read about complaints
about companies, but I am very highly suspicious of the website
owner then charging these same companies for cleaning up their
record there.
- Page 1. "They tell me [to] bring a check
for $150 for the book and training. [...] After numerous
months of not making any money, wasting my gas, money
on food, and my time and my life, [I begin to think] these
people lied to me. They make you think your an independent
contractor but in fact you're not."
- Page 2. Poster describes how during his initial
interview the interviewer wasn't interested in his past
experience but called him a "go-getter". Second
interview was a cattle call with 10 other people during
which a presentation was made that only talked about how
much money they could make. "The classes, books,
licenses, background check and fingerprinting ran a whopping
$447 total."
- Page 3. "I recently graduated from college
[...] and was offered a job with this company. I was told
their average agent makes $50,000 to $70,000 their first
year with some agents earning $100,000. My job offer was
revoked after I asked [...] how many people were successful."
- Page 4. "Long story short, between the 80
hour work weeks that robbed [my family] of our time together,
the ragged out car [from all the travel to sales calls]
and the $10,000 credit card bill, I can't decide how they
SCREWED us the worst."
- Page 5. "They said the fee for the class
was $250. [When] I told them that I had a school near
me that is $100 less, [they lost interest] in me."
- Page 6. Poster complains of working 80 hour weeks,
killing his car with the frequent travel, paying for food
and lodging when going to sales conferences, and never
made the income the company (mis-?)represented. "I
drained my account based on a promise, all I had to do
is follow their method. I followed their method and was
set back at least $3000 for my trouble."
- A
JobVent
user writes:
- "I
was a sales agent in Burnaby (BC, Canada) for about 7
months. I finally had to leave because of all the dishonest
practices of the company and because of the cult
mentality. My biggest problem is that my
mentors when coaching me and everyone else in
the office would instruct us to lie to
the union members about many aspects of what we were doing
in order to get the sale. [...] When I was hired they
said they were very picky about who they hire but the
truth is they will hire anyone willing to pay
the course fees up front. Even more the people
doing the hiring have little to no experience and work
are paid commission based on how many people they
hire! The also don't tell you that 99%
of agents quit in less than a year having made
very little money. [...] They had me training new agents
after I had only been selling for about a month. I had
no real experience. Most of the people I trained
quit before they even got the chance to sell anything."
- Edward
Jones
- Edward
Jones.info (archived) British site. Info is for UK, USA,
& Canada. According to this
source, Edward Jones pressured the host into closing the
site.
- RegisteredRep.com's
Forums have some interesting comments:
- "In
short, these market conditions are exposing the shortcomings
of the Jones business model. I believe there will be significant
changes to that model by this time next year. It's
basically a pyramid scheme that has been outed."
(*)
- "[Edward
Jones is] not a pyramid scheme in a pure sense [... ]
but not too far off either. 'Recruiting' like
minded people. 'Bonus Brackets' and 'LP Returns' and other
phony mumbo-jumbo to get you a bigger cut of the action
as your tenure, success, and loyalty to the firm grow
over time. Then, there's the entire indoctrination of
the spouse and family. The continued brainwashing
that goes on that only EDJ is right and just. Others firms
are somehow morally corrupt, and Jones FAs have to go
out and save the bluehairs from the evil competition.
All the while, those at the top (GPs) are raking
it in. The relatively few tenured brokers
are getting profitability bonuses and LP payments which
are essentially other people's money getting funneled
to the top. I'm convinced the whole thing was
contrived by a marvelously intelligent evil genius."
(*)
- "That
was one of my biggest complaints with Jones. I
signed up for a 60/40 split, and they were taking 15 to
20% off the top, and THEN splitting with me 60/40.
Not cool." (*)
- "I
think what angers ex-Jonesers the most is 2 things. 1.
EJ sells you on the opportunity to have your own
business, when in fact it is far from it. 2.
EJ also claims that the FA's are the only profit center
making an FA feel that the 60% going to Jones
is going for expenses and/or partnership, when in fact
it is far from it. I will be the first to admit
that I was making a career change and
jumped in without a full understanding of the
business in general and the business of EJ and
that is completely on me." (*)
(I would disagree with his final statement.)
- "When
you are at Jones, you are told it is BETTER than being
at a wirehouse, and BETTER than being [independent]. Expectations
are set so high that once people realize it is
not vastly superior, and in many ways about the same as
a wire, and definitely no better than being [independent],
with lots of kool-aid culture, you feel a little
schmucked." (*)
- A
Vault.com
user has this to say:
- "I
guess after 25 years in business, I was flattered
they had any interest in me at all. What was
about to begin would unravel my family, personal,
and financial life to the point of almost vengeful
retaliation. I was "homeschooled" on one of
their company laptops. This 2 1/2 months of studying for
the series 7 test left me with little time for anything
else. A year later, I found out I could have taken the
training for $400 on the internet. All of the
recruiting literature that was shown to me was later explained
to me by my attorney as being spurious (symbolic) and
had nothing to do with the actual working conditions that
I could expect. In other words, when Jones says
that you will "likely" be in an office in 4
months, they can take 10 years if they want. When they
tell you that you will have an assistant, it means you
have to damn near walk on water to get one. When
they say that the AVERAGE broker makes $140K per year,
it means that there are about 100 brokers who make over
a million annually out of the 9000+ brokers and pull the
average up and way out of proportion for the average person.
Jones talks about their Funnel System for marketing. After
a year, you realize that you are actually in THEIR funnel.
It was common knowledge that if you tried to open a new
branch as a new broker, you would fail, and so would the
next 2 brokers who followed. With Jones, they
own all of the accounts, so you can't take anything with
you if you stay in the business. I opened 40
accounts in 8 months, and
never opened an office. I was digging a huge hole financially
with the pittance of a salary I was on quickly coming
to an end. Still not in an office, I went to another
institution and left Jones. After my license transferred,
they sued me for $75,000 for "training costs".
Remember the $400 for series 7 on the net? I was caught
in the oldest scheme in modern history. They
never actually expected me to succeed, just paid me enough
to open accounts, gather assets, then drag their feet
on their promises. The most insidious part of the whole
slimy mess is the part in their Employment agreement called
an Integration Clause. It basically
means that anything they said, did, or represented in
any way is now B.S. An interesting statistic:
Last year Jones trained 1200 brokers, and 1150
of them left, leaving behind all of the assetts that they
had gathered, under the threat of being sued for 75K each
for training costs. I was lured out of
a 25 year old business to pursue what turned out to be
a pack of lies and broken promises. Many of the
people who started with me went broke and were living
on credit cards. Here's one more nauseating caveat: The
broker who recruited me won a trip because of my hiring."
- Edward
Jones Can Be A Great Place To Work - If You Last!
Article by L.M. SIXEL of Chron.com includes these quotes:
- "[Edward
Jones] is so focused on growth [...] that it doesn't do
enough to retain the brokers it already has."
- Attorney
General Lockyer Files Major Securities Fraud Lawsuit Against
Edward Jones. From the California Attorney General's website.
- California
Attorney General Settles Edward Jones Lawsuit
(2008).
- Independent
Capital Management (ICM)
- A
JobVent
user says the following about Independent Capital Management:
- "When
you get hired, they slap on the 'financial services specialist'
tag. But in reality you're just a telemarketer.
[...] I just feel cheated because ICM advertises
that they're something they're not. [...] They
basically flat out lied to me. During my time
there, i did not receive one cent! They make you pay for
your exams ($410) and do not give you a buffer salary
to live on while you study for them. [...] Just like a
used car salesman office, you have to
record on an dry-erase board for all to see how much you
sell every week. But how can anyone produce when they
can only sell crappy funds to their friends and
family. I hope you have a LARGE AND RICH circle
of friends to swindle...so you can 'produce.'
They won't fire you because you cost them nothing to be
there. They give you a desk and a phone and you
call your friends and family and then
their friends and family. In addition, why are
there constant ads for openings at ICM on monster/careerbuilder?
The turnover is ridiculous. [...] No
wonder they slap on the AIG label after you're hired,
otherwise this position would have no credibility to potential
prospects. The introduction script that
you pitch to prospects is 5% centered on ICM and 95% centered
on AIG."
- Northwestern
Mutual Life (NML)
- Riverfront
Times. "Training, he says, consisted of the new agents'
listing the names and contact information of 200 friends and
family members and rehearsing a scripted sales pitch for variable
insurance."
- nmlcomplaints.com
(archived) Includes negative testimonials. New grads should
see the "NM
Internship Program Facts" (archived) section:
- Many
schools exclude NM from recruiting for interns on their
campuses altogether. Numerous other schools are taking
a critical look at the company’s internship program
to determine whether or not allowing NM to recruit is
worth the potential risks to students, as well as the
school. The issue? NM grossly exaggerates
the likely income potential and is not forthcoming in
pointing out "business expenses" that interns
have to pay that are beyond licensing costs.
Also, there is the chance that an intern's commission
(income) may be reversed when policies are cancelled --
even after the internship has ended. Many students find
themselves in the position of having to borrow money from
family members or friends to pay NM's management for the
experience. NM's supporters offer a uniform knee-jerk
reaction to former interns’ claims: They state that
these individuals “couldn’t keep up”
and more commonly, “didn’t have what it takes.”
- Colin
Braybrooks from Ashville, North Carolina said:“I
just went through the NMFN sales training program, but
when it came time to sign a contract with them, I said
"no thanks". Why? Because what they promised
did not match up with what I wanted to do. By way of background,
I am an attorney and have worked in the
home office of a major insurer for a number of years.
I wanted to make a career change to get into financial
planning. I am a CLU and a ChFC. The
training I received was 100% sales training. No product
training. When you finish sales training, you start dialing
for dollars. Nobody wants to receive a telephone call
from a life insurance agent. Selling whole life insurance
today is probably the hardest product to sell. But NMFN's
relentless emphasis is on whole life sales. I also realized
that their sales training was highly unethical. They want
you to sell their insurance as an investment, which is
forbidden under state insurance laws. I could
not believe what I heard in the sales training school
from seasoned agents ‘teaching’ us the ropes.
There were nine people in my sales training class.
Seven were in their early twenties, basically right out
of college with no clue about life. Another older
‘career changer’ and myself rounded out the
class. We both decided not to sign contracts to become
NMFN representatives. But these young kids are
very impressionable and do not know enough to challenge
what they are told. For instance, NMFN wants
the agent to focus on their "dividend". But
the training they provide implies that the dividend is
paid from day one and is a much better ‘buy’
than any other ‘investment’. ‘Why put
your money in the stock market when you can get a 7.7%
return from NMFN?’ Again, this presentation is not
only VERY deceptive, it’s illegal.”
- An
email I received reads: "This website has been shut down
by order of US Circuit Judge Larry J. McKinney on July 27,
2006." The lawsuit is discussed in an
article in The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. If Northwestern
Mutual's allegations are true, then this is a textbook case
in how NOT to aid those with ostensibly legitimate complaints.
- A
JobVent
user writes:
- "I
interviewed for an 'internship' with Northwestern Mutual
recently. The job title was "Financial Representative".
When I got there, she explained this was actually a sales
internship. She said we would have 100 names and we would
call them and sell them insurance, annuities, etc. I asked
if these 100 names were people who already expressed interest
in NWM or if it was cold calling. She responded that this
list would be compiled by the interns - our friends and
family!! She said I didn't even have to come into the
office - I could make the phone calls from my home! Then,
if I got a bite, I would come in and sit in the meeting
room while some higher person made the sale. I
would get a small percentage of the profit, and NOTHING
ELSE. ONLY COMMISSION. Basically, if
your OWN family doesn't pay them, you make nothing! You'd
be better off hitting up your grandma for money all summer
long, cut out the middle man."
- Another
Jobvent
user writes:
- "I
worked for this company for 6 months before I figured
out it was a scam. Got suckered in by the '"internship'
which is their word for stealing your commissions by having
you sell insurance to your family members. [...] they
say you get a weekly paycheck but its just an advance
and if you leave you have to pay it back. I guess
it depends on what office you work in but mine was
a turnover MACHINE! I think I saw 50
reps come in the door for every one who made a decent
living."
- Primerica
Financial Services (PFS) / AL Williams
- DMOZ
Business Opportunities>Opposing Views>Primerica.
A list of critical sites. Some may no longer be in operation.
- "So
What's With Primerica?" (archived) includes this
page (archived) describing the author's allegations regarding
how Primerica recruits and (mis?)-educates its reps.
- RipOffReport.com
has a many pages of complaints/defenses on Primerica. Below
are a few. Note that Primerica is a member of RipOffReport's
Corporate Advocacy Program; they pay RipOffReport for
their "investigation" and "approval" as
a company consumers should "have confidence in".
I personally appreciate RipOffReport's value as a site where
consumers can read about complaints about companies, but I
am very highly suspicious of the website owner then charging
these same companies for cleaning up their record there.
- Page 1. "I have seen my best friend be lured
by the promises of 'wealth' and 'financial freedom'. He
has been convinced that anyone that does not like Primerica
is not worth having in your life. He has been TOLD to
attend church and join church organizations for the 'contacts'
and to improve his reputation. I have heard cult horror
stories that don't compare to the brainwashing my best
friend has received from Primerica."
- Page 2. "Primerica milked me for a list
of my friends and family, with the promise of a 'pie-in-the-sky'-type
of career. Once my list dried up, Primerica was GONE,
baby! I'm *STILL* waiting for my first paycheck from this
band of gypsies, some ten years later. [...] No reimbursement
for the test, no loans, no splitting commission for turning
over my list of contacts, no *NOTHIN'*!!!"
- Page
3. Very long thread, be patient while it loads as
it is worth the read. Original poster describes being
cold-called about her resume; being offered a 'job' at
which she would be expected to start at zero even though
she had a Master's degree; company reps were vague about
responsibilities, products, and how money is made; company
appeared 'cultic'.
- A
JobVent
user writes:
- "You
'own your own business.' That means you are an
"independent contractor" that has to assume
ALL of your own benefits! Most Primerica
reps do this on the side and use the bennies from their
REAL jobs (or their spouse's job if they have
one). [...] You work (hassle people)
at all times... usually nights/weekends/holidays
because that is the only time that people that have REAL
jobs are available. [...] If you recruit enough
people you get to be an RVP (Regional Vice President).
[...] All that means is that you were able to
recruit enough hapless family members to this lost cause.
The RVPs that I know of wore crappy clothes,
drove P.O.S. cars, and were slimy used car salesmen hucksters.
They were NOT the 'rich' people I was led to believe
were running the place."
- Another
JobVent
user writes:
- "I
showed up for the interview and it was me and over 20
other people. Apparently he liked all of them as well,
and for the same interview. You got to love his time management
skills. [...] The only ones getting rich are the ones
at the top who are making money off of your friends and
family. The problem for you (or me) is you will eventually
run out of family and friends. In the meantime they reap
the benefits. [...] It is really a genius idea if you
think about it. You advertise for jobs, troll
online jobsites, invite a massive amount of people for
interviews [...] and then hit each one
up for possible customers."
- Another
JobVent
user writes:
- "I
went on my 'interview'
only because the person calling said it was for
Citigroup and not Primerica."
- Another
JobVent
user writes:
- "The
work environment in the office is scary. It's like a constant
brain-washing to convince people that
what your doing is righteous."
- Trilogy
Financial Services (TFS)
- Blogger
Evelyn Baker attended a seminar for Trilogy Financial Services
and wrote this
article in which she described its presentation
as identical to Primerica's, i.e.
multi-level marketing like Amway;
she feels MLM is code for "pyramid scheme".
I'm not the only person noting the negative similarity problems
between some companies in the financial services industry
and MLM.
- A
JobVent
user says the following about Trilogy Financial Services:
- "This
is a terrible company to work for. You initially get hired
on as an Investment Executive, but, you don't really get
paid. You PAY THEM to work there and
you ultimately PAY for all of your licenses and
certifications. The training
they promise you in hiring is redundant.
And they threaten your job on a daily basis. So, no
salary, they take 60% of any of the business you bring
in and no benefits. Most of the "Financial
Advisors" complain to fellow co-workers on
a daily basis about not making enough money, yet put up
a fake front to business associates and prospects.
Most of the Managing Partners and Training Managers do
not hold higher degrees. They expect you to work
80 hour weeks and to prospect unless
you are sleeping. Beware with this company, as
at first it appears really nice and a great opportunity,
however, their mottos are 'fake it until you make
it'."
- World
Marketing Alliance / World Financial Group (WMA/WFG) / National
Lending Corp. (NLC) / Aegon Financial Group World
- xWMA.org
(archived).
- Attorney
Dan
Feder was at one time: "investigating a possible
nationwide class action against WFG, as it seems to me
that current and former brokers/salespersons may
be [misclassified as independent contractors and thus]
entitled to employee benefits, worker's compensation,
health insurance, and other benefits."
- Law
firm James
Hoyer were at one time: "investigating complaints
about misrepresentations in the sale of life insurance
policies by World Marketing Alliance. Some consumers
have stated that they thought they were buying annuity,
savings or investment plans [and] felt
tricked when they learned they had purchased variable
universal life insurance policies." (It
is illegal to sell insurance as an investment instrument.)
- WFG-Offline
(archived). Be sure to see the MONEY
magazine article (archived).
- RipOffReport.com
has some complaints/defenses on WMA/WFG. Search the site for
more.
- Page
1. Very detailed article with references.
- Page
2. Aaron claims: "My aunt works at WFG headquarters
and she files everyone who comes through the company.
She sent me a fax and 85% of the people who pay the $100
don't get their licenses, and of the 15% who get them,
90% leave within the first year and half of the remaining
10% leave in year 2. You don't have to be a rocket scientist
to figure out that's about 1% success rate."
- Ted
DeCorte's Eclectic Mouse Experience se
Experience (archived) implies that Zillionaire.com (offline)
/ DotPlanet.com (offline) was a biz op used as a "lead-in"
to promote the securities and investments offered via WMA.
VI.
Books on the Financial Industry
Just a few, feel free to suggest some. If you're really on a budget,
you can try getting them from ebay.
Links below go to Amazon.com,
which has used books for sale as well.
VII.
Other Links
Submit
a link or correction / Report a dead link

|
|